Movies

Hulu’s ‘WeWork’ documentary isn’t a disaster, and that’s the problem | SXSW review

WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn is a step by step telling of how Adam Neumann founded a company so big it was bound to fail

While the rise and fall of WeWork is an interesting enough fable to fuel 's WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn for some time, it's not a spectacular enough disaster to be anything more than a rundown of facts.



WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn is just one of the many films attempting to chronicle the age-old story of humans and their misguided belief that they're too big and too important to fail. Most notably, and 's dueling Fyre Festival — Fyre and Fyre Fraud, respectively — offered two different approaches to telling the tale of overinflated ego and the gloriously entertaining burst that follows.

's Fyre approaches the subject almost as a true-crime documentary by giving us the breadcrumbs — with a suspenseful atmosphere — that eventually led to disaster. On the other hand, Hulu's Fyre Fraud was a satirical comedy of errors that took a social media angle to the Fyre disaster. Both have their merits — though Netflix's film is more successful — because their angle on the subject is clear. WeWork, on the other hand, tries to piece together the best of both approaches but ends up feeling less than the sum of its parts. 


ADVERTISEMENT


Just like the title tells us, the movie begins with the making of WeWork. It gives us the background of New York City's cutthroat real estate market, founder Adam Neumann's early years in the US after immigrating from Israel, and how the idea of a futuristic coworking space would come to life. We follow the early development years that those of us that have worked in a startup knows all too well — long hours, impossible deadlines, and stretch resources. But the team did it.

However, the one thing missing from the narrative is Chekov's gun, a narrative concept that presupposes that if a story element is introduced in the first act (ex. A pistol hanging on the wall), then it has to come into play in the second act (ex. Firing the pistol). WeWork doesn't tell us exactly what is going to lead to the downfall. If anything, it does a lot of work to tell us why WeWork *will* work instead of why it won't.

There are perhaps flashes of it. A throughline in the first half is Neumann's pushback at the categorization of a real estate company. “It's a community,” he'd reply. Another bit of foreshadowing involves Neumann's wife Rebekah, Gwyneth Paltrow's cousin — a fact she points out frequently as one former employee notes, and her surprising amount of control over the business. However, neither thread payoff. 


ADVERTISEMENT


WeWork's flaw that it devotes precisely the wrong amount of time to both the “making” and “breaking” of the business without intermingling the two. What made the Fyre or even something like The Social Network so compelling is they give you the signs that point to the imminent failure. Instead, WeWork does exactly what Neumann does: sell us the vision.

However, when the movie moves to the downfall of why his vision doesn't work, it feels like it's telling us rather than showing. And because of that, it's never as entertaining or biting as your want it to be. Perhaps it's because the story of WeWork isn't as much of a spectacular disaster as the Fyre festival and Neumann isn't as intriguing of a figure as Billy McFarland or Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame. 

For those not familiar with WeWork's downfall, the documentary is a more than serviceable Wikipedia entry to catch you up. However, if you followed the news, the WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn doesn't add as much color to the story as one might have hoped. If you already knew that WeWork was a highly expensive train barrelling towards an unfinished bridge, then you already know the story. 


ADVERTISEMENT


More movies, less problems


Hey! I'm Karl. You can find me on Twitter here. I'm also a Tomatometer-approved critic.

💌 Sign up for our weekly email newsletter with movie recommendations available to stream.


ADVERTISEMENT


💌 Sign up for our weekly email newsletter with movie recommendations available to stream.


ADVERTISEMENT


Karl Delossantos

Hey, I'm Karl, founder and film critic at Smash Cut. I started Smash Cut in 2014 to share my love of movies and give a perspective I haven't yet seen represented. I'm also an editor at The New York Times, a Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic, and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.

Leave a Comment
Published by
Karl Delossantos

Recent Posts

‘Wicked’ defies expectations, a fearless movie-musical | movie review

Wicked, the long-awaited adaptation of the smash Broadway musical, finally flies its way into theaters… Read More

2 days ago

<em>No Other Land</em> is the most important documentary of our time | movie review

No Other Land follows a Palestinian activist as he documents the destruction of his community… Read More

2 months ago

Surreal dramedy <em>The Life of Chuck</em> ponders life and death | TIFF 2024

TIFF 2024 | The Life of Chuck follows an enigmatic man starting as a surrealist… Read More

2 months ago

Diabolically fun horror <em>Heretic</em> will make you believe | TIFF 2024

A pair of young Mormon missionaries find themselves at the center of a sinister plot… Read More

2 months ago

Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield charm and fall in love in <em>We Live In Time</em> | TIFF 2024

Moving back and forth in their history, We Live In Time follows a couple through… Read More

2 months ago

<em>Strange Darling</em>, a thriller to die for | movie review

While it begins as a cat-and-mouse thriller, Strange Darling evolves (and genre-bends) into a psychological… Read More

3 months ago