Categories: Movie ReviewsMovies

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: “Noah” (Film Review)

TWO-SENTENCE REVIEW: Although Darren Aronofsky's biblical epic has been shrouded with controversy, the visionary director was able to walk a very thin line to please both the religious and the regular movie goer. Bolstered by strong performances by the entire cast, strong visuals, and a filled out script, “Noah” may be one of the better biblical adaptations.

THE GOOD: The visuals. Aronofsky is always careful to capture a film in the best way possible, but “Noah” may take the cake. From the beautiful cinematography to the stunning effects, he was able to capture the beauty of the landscape, while also showing its danger.

The performances. Every single actor is at the top of their game, particularly Jennifer Connelly, , and . Each actor was able to deal with material that may not have been as deep as it needed to be and added so many layers. Watson is heartbreaking as Noah's adopted daughter who must deal with the ramifications of the needs of the mission and shows that she is an actress that can past a decade long role. Connelly is wonderful as always, but Hopkins returns in a role meant more for comic relief, but does so well with it.

However, the biggest feat for the film must be its careful screenplay, which allowed room to please those who are spiritual, religious, or simply looking for an entertaining film. There is a blanketing theme of doing what is right even thought it hurts, but also makes it's way into the territory of sin and forgiveness. Aronofsky was able to include something for everyone.

THE BAD: The dialogue. There is some questionable dialogue. Not too many cringeworthy lines, but there is enough for one to take notice.

There are small directorial mistakes. One of the more prominent is that the family uses incense to put the animals on the ark to sleep, however it doesn't affect any humans even it was able to put a full grown elephant to sleep.

THE UGLY: Unnecessary violence. This was one of the points of controversy and it shows up more than I would have liked. In an early scene Noah has a lengthy and highly choreographed fight sequence with a group of thieves who he eventually kills. He kills the men because they killed an animal. Noah then uses this to explain justice to his children, which is fine, but the fight was out of place.

SHOULD YOU SEE IT?: Yes. It's a great night at the movies and it also makes you think and feel, which is lacking in today's movies.

Karl Delossantos

Hey, I'm Karl, founder and film critic at Smash Cut. I started Smash Cut in 2014 to share my love of movies and give a perspective I haven't yet seen represented. I'm also an editor at The New York Times, a Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic, and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.

Leave a Comment
Published by
Karl Delossantos

Recent Posts

‘Wicked’ defies expectations, a fearless movie-musical | movie review

Wicked, the long-awaited adaptation of the smash Broadway musical, finally flies its way into theaters… Read More

3 days ago

<em>No Other Land</em> is the most important documentary of our time | movie review

No Other Land follows a Palestinian activist as he documents the destruction of his community… Read More

2 months ago

Surreal dramedy <em>The Life of Chuck</em> ponders life and death | TIFF 2024

TIFF 2024 | The Life of Chuck follows an enigmatic man starting as a surrealist… Read More

2 months ago

Diabolically fun horror <em>Heretic</em> will make you believe | TIFF 2024

A pair of young Mormon missionaries find themselves at the center of a sinister plot… Read More

2 months ago

Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield charm and fall in love in <em>We Live In Time</em> | TIFF 2024

Moving back and forth in their history, We Live In Time follows a couple through… Read More

2 months ago

<em>Strange Darling</em>, a thriller to die for | movie review

While it begins as a cat-and-mouse thriller, Strange Darling evolves (and genre-bends) into a psychological… Read More

3 months ago