Karl Delossantos

  • 2016 Grammy Predictions: General Field

    2016 Grammy Predictions: General Field

    It’s music’s biggest night! The Grammy Awards are coming up on February 15th. Here are our 2016 Grammy Predictions for the general field categories!2016-grammy-predictions-album-of-the-year

    Album of the Year

    Nominees:
    “1989” – Taylor Swift
    “Beauty Behind the Madness” – The Weeknd
    “Sound & Color” – Alabama Shakes
    “To Pimp A Butterfly” – Kendrick Lamar
    “Traveller” – Chris Stapleton

    Will Win: “1989” – Taylor Swift
    Could Win: “Sound &
    Should Win: “To Pimp A Butterfly” – Kendrick Lamar
    Should’ve Been Nominated: “Sometimes I Sit and Think, And Sometimes I Just Sit” – Courtney Barnett

    With a huge 11 nominations, Kendrick is obviously a widely beloved artist and “To Pimp A Butterfly” isn’t just essential listening this year, it’s an album that many have called the best of the year. However, you have to go back to 2004 for the last time a hip-hop album won Album of the Year and NO rap album has ever won the prize. Because of this, Taylor Swift should win her second AOTY for “1989” quite easily. It is the most accessible album and has strong genre support. However, watch out for a surprise from Alabama Shakes with “Sound & Color” or “Traveller” by Chris Stapelton.

    Record of the Year

    Nominees:
    “Blank Space” – Taylor Swift
    “Can’t Feel My Face” – The Weeknd
    “Really Love” – D’Angelo and the Vanguard
    “Uptown Funk” – Mark Ronson feat. Bruno Mars
    “Thinking Out Loud” – Ed Sheeran

    Will Win: “Uptown Funk” – Mark Ronson feat. Bruno Mars
    Could Win: “Can’t Feel My Face” – The Weeknd
    Should Win: “Blank Space” – Taylor Swift
    Should’ve Been Nominated: “Loud Places” – Jamie xx feat. Romy

    2016-grammy-predictions-taylor-swiftIt’s important to note the distinction between Record of the Year and Song of the Year. The former honors the production of songs — the actual recording. This includes the mixing, the performance by the vocalists, and the actual recording of the track. That being said, the most production heavy song of the nominees is “Uptown Funk.” It should win pretty easily here. However, watch out for hit song “Can’t Feel My Face” to upset. “Blank
    Space” is a song that was made in post-production. Without it, it would have been a subpar pop song. However, the most dynamic and layered song of the year had to have come from Jamie xx’s In Colour with “Loud Places.”

    Song of the Year

    Nominees:
    “Alright” – Kendrick Lamar
    “Blank Space” – Taylor Swift
    “Girl Crush” – Little Big Town
    “See You Again” – Charlie Puth feat. Wiz Kalifa
    “Thinking Out Loud” – Ed Sheeran

    Will Win: “Blank Space” – Taylor Swift
    Could Win: “Thinking Out Loud” – Ed Sheeran
    Should Win: “Thinking Out Loud” – Ed Sheeran
    Should’ve Been Nominated: “I Love You, Honeybear” – Father John Misty

    Usually the most “songwriter” friendly song wins in this category. That’s why we’ve seen winners like “Royals” and “Need You Now” in the past while the Record winner was different. That’s why it’s going to be a tight race between “Blank Space” and “Thinking Out Loud.” I think Taylor Swift, who has been nominated twice in the past in this category, should take it, especially if she loses her other two general field nominations. However, don’t be surprised if “Thinking Out Loud” takes it.

    Best New Artist

    Nominees:
    Courtney Barnett
    james-bay-2016-grammy-predictionsJames Bay
    Meghan Trainor
    Sam Hunt
    Tori Kelly

    Will Win: Meghan Trainor
    Could Win: James Bay
    Should Win: Courtney Barnett
    Should’ve Been Nominated: Hozier

    First off, had Hozier been nominated, he would win this category easily. However, as usual, the Grammys messed up. The last few years, the winner is the artist with the most Grammy nominations in the past and this year. Meghan Trainor should win because of her two nominations last year. However, James Bay racked up several rock nominations, so he is a close spoiler. Courtney Barnett created a sound so unique that no one else but her deserves the award.

  • 2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Director

    2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Director

    Best Director has quickly become the category where the visionary filmmaker is honored. Ang Lee won for “Life of Pi” in 2013, Alfonso Cuarón for “Gravity” in 2014, and Alejandro G. Iñarritu for “Birdman” in 2015 (his film was the most visionary of the group, at least). However, this year we have the debacle of having two directors from visual effects heavy, high production films: George Miller (“Mad Max: Fury Road”) and Alejandro G. Iñarritu (“The Revenant”).mad-max-fury-road-best-director-oscars

    Miller and his film nearly dominated all the critics awards leading up to the guilds, where the film stumbled. Iñarritu won the Globe, however there is a lot of precedent against him rather than for him. Only twice in the history of the Oscars has a director won Best Director consecutively — John Ford and Joseph L. Mankiewicz. This does not lend well to an Iñarritu win.

    If you take stats into consideration, the correlation between Best Picture and Best Director is an important one. Since the year 2000, the winner of Best Picture didn’t match up with Best Director only five times:

    2001: Steven Soderbergh (“Traffic”) won director; “Gladiator” won picture
    2003: Roman Polanski (“The Pianist”) won director; “Chicago” won picture
    2006: Ang Lee (“Brokeback Mountain”) won director; “Crash” won picture
    2013: Ang Lee (“Life of Pi”) won director; “Argo” won picture
    2014: Alfonso Cuarón (“Gravity”) won director; “12 Years a Slave” won picture

    So if the trend holds, it’s likely that the Best Picture winner also wins Best Director. We’re predicting “Spotlight” to take Best Picture, which gives Tom McCarthy (“Spotlight”) the edge.

    I think that we’re going to see another split year. If “Spotlight” takes Picture, what takes Director?

    the-big-short-best-director-oscarsThere is too much history going against Iñarritu. Even worse, I think voters are aware of the record and don’t want to see him join the likes of John Ford and Joseph L. Mankiewicz. In that case, George Miller wins the award. However, the DGA is going to be extremely important here. I can foresee Adam McKay (“The Big Short”) upsetting there. Either way, whoever wins DGA will probably win the Oscar.

    Check out all our 2016 Oscar predictions here!

    *My “if I had an Oscar ballot” pick

    Rankings:
    1. George Miller (“Mad Max: Fury Road”)*
    2. Alejandro G. Iñarritu (“The Revenant”)
    3.Adam McKay (“The Big Short”)
    4. Tom McCarthy (“Spotlight”)
    5. Lenny Abrahamson (“Room”)

    Should’ve been nominated: Alex Garland (“Ex Machina”), Andrew Haigh (“45 Years”), & Denis Villeneuve (“Sicario”)

  • The Book of Joe Book Review — Jonathan Tropper proves coming-of-age isn’t just for teens

    The Book of Joe Book Review — Jonathan Tropper proves coming-of-age isn’t just for teens

    The Book of Joe is an often hilarious and sometimes sweet take on the life of a man of a certain age.

    I think nailing comedy in a book is a lot harder than a lot of people think. It is difficult to get a joke to land properly when you can’t control its pacing or timing. However, Jonathan Tropper has a way with words that it doesn’t need to be a set-up and punchline set-up to be funny. He’s just a damn funny writer. That’s why the clear plot issues in his debut Plan B are easy to look over when you’re laughing at the fact that three grown adults are arguing over how to knock someone out properly.

    The Book of Joe, his second novel, takes that biting humor and puts into that “return to hometown” plot. However, although those types of books and movies get tedious and cloying, Tropper’s overall wittiness and brutal humor make it a refreshing read. The novel tells the story of Joe Goffman, a bestselling offer who did what any great writer does — write from experience. In his case, he writes about his hometown Bush Falls, the people, and his experiences. His book becomes a hit and is turned into a popular movie. He never thought he would have to return to Bush Falls again. That is until his father falls into a coma.




    His return to the Falls is obviously not received. It seems that everybody in the town hates him. Well, almost everybody. His old best friend Wayne still accepts him, who ends up being the source for much of his growth in the book, and his nephew, who seems to always be in the wrong place at the right time. However, the hatred in the town is palpable. As evidenced by the milkshake thrown in his face shortly after he arrives and an assault by the town’s book club with copies of Bush Falls. Needless to say, the town isn’t happy with Joe’s “exposé,” which he even admits is fair considering he was brutal in his literary assault on the citizens of Bush Falls.

    The Book of JoeSome of the plot devices aren’t too inspired — sick father who was never loving, a dead mother, a popular older brother, an awkward return to a hometown. However, Tropper tames them by adequately giving a reason behind their existence. What plot lines do work are the ones involving his high school best friends Wayne and Sammy, and his high school girlfriend Carly.

    The first half of the novel alternates between present day and the fictional Bush Falls novel that Joe wrote. Giving backstory while the action takes place is a huge reason why the first half is so successful. Sometimes, the passages from Bush Falls even surpass the present because of its pure quality in writing. Though characters get mopped up into stereotypes like the best friend’s hot mom or the closeted star athlete, Tropper makes up for it with depth in others.

    Tropper tends to write about 30-somethings going through radical changes in life. However, you don’t have to be a 30-something to enjoy this book. A vein of regret, loneliness, and redemption run through the novel. There are surprising moments of genius in his writing:

    “Loneliness doesn’t exist on any single plane of consciousness. It’s generally a low throb, barely audible, like the hum of a Mercedes engine in park, but every so often the demands of the highway call for a burst of acceleration, and the hum becomes a thunderous, elemental roar, and once again you’re reminded of what this baby’s carrying under the hood.”

    [Tweet ““Loneliness doesn’t exist on any single plane of consciousness.” – The Book of Joe”]

    It’s what Tropper does best, he caters to the everyday person — the person that may not be looking for the next Crime and Punishment, but for an easy and entertaining read that has enough depth to keep it engaging. The language he uses will appeal to the highly visual reader who plays a movie in their head while they read. He has surprising passages of genius that still use his witty and hilarious style.




    “To err, as they say, is human. To forgive is divine. To err by withholding your forgiveness until it’s too late is to become divinely fucked up.”

    He made some missteps in the second half. Mainly, the lack of flashbacks bogs down the story a bit (which it usually does the opposite), and the main character’s growth becomes a bit stunted. However, the character of Wayne is able to drive and protect the second half from

    The Book of Joe doesn’t come close to reaching the heights of This Is Where I Leave You, though I’m afraid he may never, but it does make for unexpected read. With surprising themes of regret, forgiveness, loneliness, and redemption, The Book of Joe will thoroughly entertain you, tug at your heart, and, eventually give you hope that life can be put back onto track. 7.5/10

  • 2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Picture

    2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Picture

    spotlight-best-picture-oscarsmThis is perhaps the most competitive race for Best Picture this decade, maybe even this century. Never has the field been so divided. It seems that every precursor indicator contradicts another and just when we think momentum is building, it is quickly taken away.

    “Spotlight” maintained the frontrunner status throughout the critics awards even thought it ended up splitting wins up pretty evenly with “Mad Max: Fury Road.” However, Mad Max feels too genre to be a legitimate Best Picture contender, which is why most pundits were calling the race. Then, in a wild twist, Best Supporting Actor locks Mark Ruffalo and Michael Keaton missed nominations at both the Golden Globes and Screen Actors Guild Awards. Many pundits saw it as a sign of weakness. This narrative was further bolstered by snubs at the ACE Eddy Awards and for Best Director at the BAFTAs.

    In the wake of Spotlight’s demise, “The Revenant” picked up steam by winning Best Actor, and shockingly, Best Picture and Best Director at the Golden Globes. This narrative was supported by it wildly over performing in Oscar nominations, receiving a leading 12. Pundits began to split both for “Spotlight” and “The Revenant.”

    room-2015-best-picture-oscarsThen, in what could be the biggest twist of the season, “The Big Short” won the Producer’s Guild Award, which tends to be the best indicator for the Oscars.

    So, who wins? I honestly don’t know. What I can say with some certainty is that “Brooklyn,” “The Martian,” and “Bridge of Spies” will not be the winner. However, a case could be made for “Room,” which I’ll discuss in a separate post.

    No matter who wins, some trend or record will be broken. If “The Revenant” wins, it would be the first time since “Million Dollar Baby” won in 2004 that the Best Picture winner was released in December. Also, it would be the first winner since “Braveheart” in 19— to not be nominated for the Best Ensemble at the SAG Awards.

    If “The Big Short” wins, it would be a rare comedy that wins, and one of the even fewer winner to win with only five total nominations. In addition, it was a December release.

    Lastly, “Spotlight” has not yet won a major precursor awards (Golden Globe or PGA). While it should win at the SAG awards, “The Big Short” could certainly upset. For its chances to stay alive, it needs to win Best Ensemble.

    So, back to my initial question. Who wins?

    I think that this is one of the few years that there isn’t a definitive answer. Even when it was “12 Years a Slave” vs. “Gravity” vs. “American Hustle” in 2014, it was still clear that “12 Years” was going to go away with the win.

    Because of its early frontrunner status and a win at the SAG awards, I think “Spotlight” is going to take the win. However, “The Big Short” is a very close second.

    Check out all our 2016 Oscar predictions here!

    *My “if I had an Oscar ballot” pick

    Rankings:
    1.Spotlight
    2. The Big Short
    3. The Revenant
    4. Mad Max: Fury Road*
    5. Room
    6. The Martian
    7. Bridge of Spies
    8. Brooklyn

    Should have been nominated: Ex Machina, Sicario, & Anamolisa

  • 2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actress

    2016 Oscar Predictions: Best Supporting Actress

    Out of the three acting races at this year’s Oscars, Best Supporting Actress is by far that hardest one to suss out. Unlike the last few years, there hasn’t been one actress that has been consistently winning awards and that has the clear momentum that makes her the frontrunner for the Oscars. The critics awards had no consensus with winners. Kristen Stewart (“Clouds of Sils Maria”) ended up being the most consistent winner, however she was snubbed at the Oscars. Part of the lack of consensus could be due to the fact that two of the nominees this year have been nominated and won awards in the lead category. Alicia Vikander (“The Danish Girl”) and Rooney Mara (“Carol”) have both been campaigned in supporting when in screen time and in plot their roles are clearly lead. In fact, Rooney Mara won Best Actress at the Cannes Film Festival over Cate Blanchett, who is nominated in lead. I guess when your character is the title of the movie, everyone else just supports you.

    rooney-mara-oscar
    Clear category fraud and sleazy Oscar campaign tactics aside (we’re looking at your Weinstein), Vikander has the advantage of having two successful movies that she has been nominated for and won for. She won at the Los Angeles Film Critics Awards for “Ex Machina” and at the Critics Choice Awards for “The Danish Girl.” She was also a double nominee at the Golden Globes. However, of the films the women are nominated, “The Danish Girl” is one of the least popular films, perhaps only being surpassed by “Steve Jobs” in unpopularity (although Kate Winslet has something else going for her, we’ll discuss this later). Really, who actually liked “The Danish Girl”? Granted, she is the strongest aspect of the film.

    Jennifer Jason Leigh (“The Hateful Eight”) is similar to Sylvester Stallone (“Creed”) in the Best Supporting Actor category in that the nomination was going to be her biggest hurdle. While she was nominated at the Golden Globes, she missed an important Screen Actors Guild nomination. Her performance is truly the apple in a bag of oranges. She is beaten to a pulp, abused, dragged around — she works for her Oscar. She has also been long ignored by the Oscars and can be seen as overdue. However, “The Hateful Eight” was widely ignored. The only other nomination it received was for its score.

    alicia-vikander-oscarThe wild-card of the race is Kate Winslet (“Steve Jobs”). On her seventh nomination (and with one win under her belt), Winslet is the most decorated nominee of the bunch. With an odd Golden Globes win under her belt, she should theoretically be the frontrunner. However, the Globes seemed to have had a love affair with “Steve Jobs” — it won the combined screenplay category as wall — and Winslet could have just been taken along for the ride.

    In the end, the only acting nominee that has little to no chance is Rachel McAdams (“Spotlight“). Despite being in the only best picture nominee of the bunch, her role is extremely understated and barely registers emotionally. If “Spotlight” wins Best Picture and takes an acting award with it, it’s more likely to be Mark Ruffalo than McAdams.

    What this race really boils down to is which nominee’s positives outweighs their negatives. Mara has the most screen time and Cannes award for Best Actress under her belt, however she has a quiet performance that typically doesn’t win in this category. Vikander is the breakout of the group with two successful movies, but will the unpopularity of “The Danish Girl” hurt her? Leigh has the big, bombastic performance that voters love, but her film and role are not terribly easy to watch. Winslet won the Globe and is an industry veteran in the hunt for her second win and although its been done, a second win has to feel like its imminent, and this year it’s anything but. Lastly, we have McAdams who has a quiet role in the Best Picture nominee.

    I’m going to go with Alicia Vikander for the win here. However, it is the least confident I am in an above the line category. Winslet or Leigh can easily steal this from her. Even Mara has an outside shot. This is truly going to be the category that is going to keep us guessing until the envelope is opened.

    Check out all our 2016 Oscar predictions here!

    * “If I had an Oscar ballot” pick

    Rankings:

    1. Alicia Vikander (“The Danish Girl”)
    2. Kate Winslet (“Steve Jobs”)*
    3. Jennifer Jason Leigh (“The Hateful Eight”)
    4. Rooney Mara (“Carol”)
    5. Rachel McAdams (“Spotlight”)

    Should’ve been nominated: Alicia Vikander (“Ex Machina”), Rose Byrne (“Spy”)

  • The Revenant Movie Review — A flawed, but well-crafted survival

    The Revenant Movie Review — A flawed, but well-crafted survival

    revenant-leoThere’s something to say for good filmmaking, and that’s what The Revenant is — good filmmaking. It is a film that comes alive in its cinematography, editing, and sound. However, I think it’s the restraint on these factors that takes it to great, and at times, impossible filmmaking. Starring Leonardo DiCaprio and directed by last year’s Oscar winner for Best Director Alejandro González Iñárritu, The Revenant follows the true story of Hugh Glass (DiCaprio), who goes on a journey of survival and revenge. There are films that really shouldn’t be researched before watching, and this is one of them. However, because of the high-profile nature of the film — thanks to the fact that Leo might actually finally win an Oscar — that has largely been impossible. If you can’t bear it, take a look at the trailer, however, if you were somehow able to dodge anything about the movie, I would go in with fresh eyes.

    Despite my plea in the last paragraph, I am going to talk about a scene in the film. The first one to be exact. It covers a battle between a Native American tribe and the group of hunters and trappers that Glass is working with. The film opens with a steady, but off-putting shot of pristine wilderness. Off-putting because of its calmness — a feeling you’ll be grasping for throughout the movie — and because of the fact that most of the movie was filmed using natural light.




    With all respect due to DiCaprio, the real star of this film is the cinematography by two-time Oscar winner Emmanuelle Lubezki whose work in the film rivals his own in “The Tree of Life.” While his work in his two winning films — “Gravity” and “Birdman” — are truly outstanding, his work in this film is the kind that will be taught to future generations of filmmakers. Battling with a frigid temperatures, Lubezki decided to film solely with natural light.

    “We wanted to make a movie that was immersive and visceral… The idea of using natural light came because we wanted the audience to feel, I hope, that this stuff is really happening.”

    -Emmanuelle Lubezki

    This decision alone elevated the film to not only become a story of revenge, but that of an appreciation and fear of nature’s force. It heightened the stakes and helped enhance the performances by letting them take the forefront, rather than hiding expressions behind studio lights.

    Not only does this scene establish beautifully the stylistic tone of the film, it shows reverence for nature, which is both a beast and ally in the movie. That is until it is disturbed by Glass and his son. We then jump to the campsite where the rest of the group is camped out. An eeriness hushes over the group when they catch wind that they are about to be attacked. So begins an epic one-take shot of the battle that rivals Lubezki’s own work in “Gravity.” It’s this tension, followed by pure and unadulterated violence, documented in a sure and gorgeously directed manner that perfectly sets up the film.

    So begins a tale of survival, revenge, spirituality, life, and death.

    Despite the absolutely thrilling first two acts, the film loses its footing in the third — which could be attributed to the fact that the film almost wasn’t done in the first place. Where the first two acts flowed with sweeping one-take shots, natures own white noise, and the gripping expanse of both the plot and the environment, the last feels clumsy, spastic, and over-produced.

    There are performances, then there is what DiCaprio did, which is dedicate himself to his art. His performance is one of brute force that is only enhanced by the fact that he has very little dialogue, which is spoken in two languages. In very few films has DiCaprio disappeared into a role, but this is the first that he has truly been immersed.




    That is not to take away from the phenomenal work done by Tom Hardy, Will Poulter, and Domhnall Gleeson (who is having an amazing year with “Brooklyn,” “Ex Machina,” and “Star Wars” on his filmography.

    My biggest criticism of “The Revenant” is that the overall plot is really not there. It’s emotionally flat and other than the revenge aspect, there’s very little to follow. When the film actually does show any semblance of a plot, it feels clunky, which is why the third act fell so badly.

    “The Revenant” can be seen in many ways. A period piece, a revenge film, a survival film, a “bro” film. However, the one vein that runs through all of these classifications is its level of difficulty and its level of success despite. Seemingly impossible one-take shots, a surprisingly emotional arc, and gorgeously realized design, “The Revenant” is one of those films that you leave the theater not being able to speak until you leave out of respect.

    It has its flaws. Its grand visuals are sometimes bogged down by self-important emotional drives, its restraint sometimes wasted in repetitive indulgence, and its last third rushed. However, it’s easy to get lost in story, mostly thanks to DiCaprio’s performance. Will you leave the theater as satisfied as you’d hope? Most likely not. Its epic scope is somewhat squandered towards the end and what should be an emotionally resonant story ends up feeling flat.

    6/10

    Buy or Rent The Revenant on Amazon!

  • 2016 Golden Globe Film Predictions: Complete List

    2016 Golden Globe Film Predictions: Complete List

    The Golden Globes are this Sunday, which kicks off the end of the awards season. See who will take home gold and who will go home empty handed with our Golden Globe Film Predictions!

    2015-07-30-09_46_02-spotlight-trailer-1-2015-mark-ruffalo-michael-keaton-movie-hd-youtubeBest Motion Picture – Drama

    Nominees:
    Carol
    Mad Max: Fury Road
    The Revenant
    Room
    Spotlight

    Will Win: Spotlight
    Could Win: The Revenant
    Should Win: Mad Max: Fury Road

    Spotlight has been the consistent frontrunner up to this point and has yet to show any sign of weakness. However, the Hollywood Foreign Press likes… well, foreign things. Alejandro Inurritu, who won last year for Birdman, could take it again with The Revenant. 

    Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Drama

    Nominees:
    Cate Blanchett, Carol
    Brie Larson, Room
    Rooney Mara, Carol
    Saoirse Ronan, Brooklyn
    Alicia Vikander, The Danish Girl

    Will Win: Brie Larson, Room
    Could Win: Saoirse Ronan, Brooklyn
    Should Win: Brie Larson, Room

    Brie Larson is an unproven frontrunner as of yet. The critics did not go for her. However, she is the Oscar frontrunner, which is often infallible when it comes to wins here. Don’t be surprised if any other one of the nominees takes it.

    dicaprio-xlargeBest Actor in a Motion Picture – Drama

    Nominees:
    Bryan Cranston, Trumbo
    Leonardo DiCaprio, The Revenant
    Michael Fassbender, Steve Jobs
    Eddie Redmayne, The Danish Girl
    Will Smith, Concussion

    Will Win: Leonardo DiCaprio, The Revenant
    Could Win: Bryan Cranston, Trumbo
    Should Win: Michael Fassbender, Steve Jobs

    Both Leonardo DiCaprio and Bryan Cranston have good track records at the Globes. However, with the former looking to finally win his first Oscar, the Globes are sure to try to be on the right side of history.

    Up Next: Comedy/Musical Categories

    Best Motion Picture – Comedy/Musical

    bigshottrailerNominees:
    The Big Short
    Joy
    The Martian
    Spy
    Trainwreck

    Will Win: The Big Short
    Could Win: The Martian
    Should Win: The Martian

    Had there not been a controversy over The Martian‘s placement in the comedy categories it would easily win here. However, several HFPA members have voiced that they would not vote for it simply because it was misplaced. The Big Short should win here, though there could be a scenario where the critically acclaimed The Martian or the true comedy Spy could still win.

    Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Comedy/Musical

    Nominees:
    Christian Bale, The Big Short
    Steve Carrell, The Big Short
    Matt Damon, The Martian
    Al Pacino, Danny Collins
    Mark Ruffalo, Infinity Polar Bear

    Will Win: Matt Damon, The Martian
    Could Win: Steve Carrell, The Big Short
    Should Win: Matt Damon, The Martian

    While there was a huge controversy over The Martian’s category placement, it’s hard to imagine anyone else in this category winning other than Matt Damon, who has the best chance to land an Oscar nomination of the group.

    spy-1Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Comedy/Musical

    Nominees:
    Jennifer Lawrence, Joy
    Melissa McCarthy, Spy
    Amy Schumer, Trainwreck
    Maggie Smith, The Lady in the Van
    Lily Tomlin, Grandma

    Will Win: Jennifer Lawrence, Joy
    Could Win: Amy Schumer, Trainwreck
    Should Win: Melissa McCarthy, Spy

    Like in the actor category, the winner should be the nominee with the best shot at the Oscars, who is Jennifer Lawrence. However, the Globes love going with buzz and it-girl Amy Schumer definitely has it, so I wouldn’t be surprised if she pulled off a win. Melissa McCarthy has the best comedy performance in the category as a new bumbling spy.

    Up Next: Other Categories

    Beasts of No NationBest Supporting Actor

    Nominees:
    Paul Dano, Love & Mercy
    Idris Elba, Beasts of No Nation
    Mark Rylance, Bridge of Spies
    Michael Shannon, 99 Homes
    Sylvester Stallone, Creed

    Will Win: Mark Rylance, Bridge of Spies
    Could Win: Sylvester Stallone, Creed
    Should Win: Idris Elba, Beasts of No Nation

    Best Supporting Actress

    Nominees:
    Jane Fonda, Youth
    Jennifer Jason Leigh, The Hateful Eight
    Helen Mirren, Trumbo
    Alicia Vikander, Ex Machina
    Kate Winslet, Steve Jobs

    Will Win: Alicia Vikander, Ex Machina
    Could Win: Jennifer Jason Leigh, The Hateful Eight
    Should Win: Kate Winslet, Steve Jobs

    Best Director

    Nominees:
    Todd Haynes, Carol
    Alejandro González Iñárritu, The Revenant
    Tom McCarthy, Spotlight
    George Miller, Mad Max: Fury Road
    Ridley Scott, The Martian

    Will Win: George Miller, Mad Max: Fury Road
    Could Win: Ridley Scott, The Martian
    Should Win: Ridley Scott, The Martian

    stevejobsBest Screenplay

    Nominees:
    Room
    Spotlight
    The Big Short
    Steve Jobs
    The Hateful Eight

    Will Win: Spotlight
    Could Win: The Big Short
    Should Win: Steve Jobs

  • Spotlight is a masterclass in storytelling | review

    Spotlight is a masterclass in storytelling | review

    Refreshingly realistic, superbly acted, and top-notch direction, Spotlight proves to be one of the best movies of the year

    About thirty minutes into Spotlight, Boston Globe reporters Sacha Pfeiffer (Rachel McAdams) and Michael Rezendes (Mark Ruffalo) speak to two of the victims of abuse at the hand of Catholic priests belonging to the Archdiocese of Boston. The two separate interviews are interwoven, one amplifying the message of the other. And in the background — both literally and figuratively — is the Church. It’s scenes like these where Spotlight transforms from an engrossing journalistic slow burn into a marvelous empathetic piece of humanity.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    Spotlight, directed by Todd McCarthy, tells the story of the Pulitzer Prize-winning investigation into the Boston Catholic Church scandal. Headed by Walter “Robby” Robinson (Michael Keaton), the Boston Globe Spotlight team explore the cover-up of over 90 cases of sexual abuse and molestation of children by Catholic priests.

    While Spotlight is a feat of classic screenwriting that harkens back to the days of All the President’s Men or Network, McCarthy’s subtle direction is what amplifies it to greatness.

    In frames and in dialogue, the Church’s power is feared and felt. The movie emphasizes: The Church is Boston and Boston is the Church. As attorney Mitch Garabedian (Stanley Tucci) says, “if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to abuse one.” Moments of pure tension — the ones that bring the film alive — are brought about by the invisible power of the Church and the survivor’s trauma. And while their experience is central, it never feels exploitative.

    Unlike the inaptly named film Truth from the same year, Spotlight feels like it’s after the truth, just as much as the journalists at its center.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    Using natural lighting, imperfect takes, and casting actors according to their strengths gives the movie a cinéma vérité feel that is all the more affecting.

    McCarthy leaves dramatic moments to characters rather than formulating the plot around shocking reveals or twists.

    The entire ensemble — which Open Road has stressed in their campaign, the word ensemble — is at their career bests. John Slattery is perfect in his follow-up to Mad Men in a role that may feel similar but allows him to flex a muscle he’s been honing for the years the show has been on air. And while Michael Keaton and Mark Ruffalo have been receiving the bulk of the acclaim of the actors on the Spotlight team, Rachel McAdams steals the… well, spotlight. Controlled and assured, her performance is an anchoring calm that lets the story take the forefront.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    And that’s what makes Tom McCarthy’s direction so smart. Its restraint allows its subject to shine. The performances give it the time it deserves. Instead of dramatics, Spotlight feels so character driven.

    Spotlight tells the story that started the story. In today’s media environment, the role of the press has been both challenged yet as important as ever. The reverence that the movie has for the journalistic process is not only admirable but essential. It goes against anything that we’ve been forced to understand in film nowadays — bigger, louder, more tears, less emotion. However, Spotlight finds itself the best when the script doesn’t try, the actors don’t act, and camera just follows. Spotlight stays with you, if not for the film, at least for the truths that it uncovers.

    It reminds us that we deserve the truth, it just takes someone (or someones) to uncover it.

    Where to watch Spotlight:


    ADVERTISEMENT


    More movies, less problems


    Hey! I’m Karl. You can find me on Twitter and Letterboxd. I’m also a Tomatometer-approved critic.

    💌 Sign up for our weekly email newsletter with movie recommendations available to stream.


    ADVERTISEMENT


  • 2015 Emmy Predictions: Our final picks on who will win

    2015 Emmy Predictions: Our final picks on who will win

    The 2015 Emmy Awards are this Sunday where Television’s finest will come together to honor the best and brightest of the year. Below are our final predictions on who will win and who should stay home. Here are our 2015 Emmy Predictions!

    Come back to Smash Cut tonight for our Live Blog of the ceremony!

    game of thrones the wars to comeDrama Series
    Better Call Saul
    Downton Abbey
    Game of Thrones***
    Homeland
    House of Cards
    Mad Men

    This is probably one of the toughest races of the night, especially with the new voting system, it’s really a race between two beloved series. Mad Men received critical raves for its final season and remains one of Hollywood’s one of most beloved series. It helps that the show hasn’t won a single Emmy in nearly two years and still has yet to win an acting award, which is widely known. The other is not only a beloved series, but also the biggest series in the world. Game of Thrones received more than any other nominee this year, which is a feat in itself. It also won 8 awards at the Creative Arts Emmys this past weekend, which is one away from tying The West Wing’s record for the most awards won in a single year of 9. While I think it’s going to be close, I’m going to call the race for Game of Thrones.

    Lead Actor in a Drama Series
    Dominic West, The Affair
    Bob Odenkirk, Better Call Saul
    Kyle Chandler, Bloodline
    Kevin Spacey, House of Cards
    Jon Hamm, Mad Men***
    Jeff Daniels, The Newsroom
    Liev Schreiber, Ray Donovan

    I think it’s a pretty well known fact that Mad Men never won an acting Emmy. However, the most egregious of those snubs comes from their leading man. Jon Hamm has a HUGE Emmy IOU that I think they’re likely to pay this year. However, he has to look out for Kevin Spacey, who is a well liked industry actor, Bob Odenkirk, who has a strong episode submission, and Kyle Chandler, the man who beat Hamm the year he should have been unbeatable. Hamm should have this one locked up pretty tight, but one of the 3 men mentioned could surprise.

    ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Lead Actress in a Drama Series
    Taraji P. Henson, Empire
    Claire Danes, Homeland
    Robin Wright, House of Cards
    Viola Davis, How to Get Away with Murder***
    Elizabeth Moss, Mad Men
    Tatiana Maslany, Orphan Black

    This is a race between two huge performances by two actors who are extremely respected in the industry. Viola Davis has been in the conversation for the Emmy before her show even premiered. The two-time Oscar nominee gives a passionate performance in How to Get Away with Murder that in any other year would win in a walk. However, this year she has to contend with Taraji P. Henson whose larger than life performance in Empire won her raves and propelled her to become a pop culture icon. It’s going to be a close race, however I think Davis has too much momentum behind her for her not to lose.

    Supporting Actor in a Drama Series
    Jonathan Banks, Better Call Saul***
    Ben Mendohlson, Bloodline
    Jim Carter, Downton Abbey
    Peter Dinklage, Game of Thrones
    Alan Cumming, The Good Wife
    Michael Kelly, House of Cards

    Jonathan Banks has this race locked up for his surprisingly heartbreaking portrayal of Mike. If he gets any challenge, it would come from Michael Kelly or Ben Mendohlson, but don’t count on it.

    christina hendricks supporting actress in a drama seriesSupporting Actress in a Drama Series
    Joanne Froggatt, Downton Abbey
    Emilia Clarke, Game of Thrones
    Lena Headey, Game of Thrones***
    Christine Baranski, The Good Wife
    Christina Hendricks, Mad Men
    Uzo Aduba, Orange is the New Black

    This is probably one of the most competitive acting races this year, with 4 contenders having legitimate shots at winning the Emmy. Lena Headey was the early favorite to win for the “Mother’s Mercy” episode of the show. However, with the new popular vote and the controversy over her body double, she is going to get strong competition from more popular choices like Christina Hendricks or Christina Baranski, who are both overdue for their roles or Uzo Aduba, who is an industry it-girl and current Emmy champ. I think Headey maintains her edge from early momentum, but Hendricks is going to give her a hell of a fight.


    Selina signs her bookComedy Series
    The Big Bang Theory
    Louie
    Modern Family
    Parks and Recreation
    Transparent
    Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
    Veep***

    Nearly everyone who watches the Emmys, has something to do with the Emmys, or hear about it secondhand know that Modern Family has won an egregious number of Emmys

    Lead Actress in a Comedy Series
    Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback
    Lily Tomlin, Grace and Frankie
    Edie Falco, Nurse Jackie
    Amy Schumer, Inside Amy Schumer
    Amy Poehler, Parks and Recreation***
    Julia Louis Dreyfus, Veep

    Julia Louis Dreyfus has won this category three years in a row and continues with phenomenal performances in the show. However, there are two contenders who have factors that will help them in the popular vote. Amy Poehler is incredibly overdue in this category and an industry favorite. On the other hand, Amy Schumer is Hollywood’s it-girl, whose show shocked in multiple categories. I think the latter Amy seems to have the momentum, but I think it’s going to Poehler who finally makes it up to the stage. NOTE: This is my gutsy prediction of the year. Pretty much no one else is predicting her.

    shameless-recap-150405Lead Actor in a Comedy Series
    Anthony Anderson, Blackish
    Matt Leblanc, Episodes
    Don Cheadle, House of Lies
    Will Forte, Last Man on Earth
    Louie CK, Louie
    William H. Macy, Shameless
    Jeffrey Tambor, Transparent***

    With perennial winner Jim Parsons out of the way, Jeffrey Tambor should have a clear path to win here. The only nominee that can really give him any competition is Macy.

    Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series
    Mayim Bialik, The Big Bang Theory
    Niecy Nash, Getting On
    Julie Bowen, Modern Family
    Allison Janney, Mom***
    Kate McKinnon, Saturday Night Live
    Gaby Hoffman, Transparent
    Jane Krakowski, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
    Anna Chlumpsky, Veep

    If we were still under the old system of voting, Anna Chlumpsky would have won for her incredible performance in her episode submission. However, because of the new popular vote, a win for her will be harder to come by. I think that last year’s winner Allison Janney is probably just going to repeat because of lazy name checking. Jane Krakowski, who never won for her performance on 30 Rock, has a sliver of a chance, as does two time winner Julie Bowen, but I think Janney has this pretty locked up.

    Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series
    Andre Braugher, Brooklyn Nine-Nine
    Adam Driver, Girls
    Keegan Michael-Key, Key and Peele
    Ty Burrell, Modern Family
    Tituss Burgess, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt***
    Tony Hale, Veep

    This is essentially a three man race. When nominations came out, the early frontrunner with the hilarious “Peeno Noir” episode was Tituss Burgess. However, after the popular vote proved to have more influence on the race than we originally thought, I think that last year’s winner Ty Burrell or 2013’s winner Tony Hale will take it. Hale has a strong submission, while Burrell is obviously a favorite. As with many categories, I’m going with the early momentum, which has worked for me in the past, so I think Burgess is still taking it.

  • The Art of Fielding Book Review — A Baseball Novel For Anyone to Enjoy

    The Art of Fielding Book Review — A Baseball Novel For Anyone to Enjoy

    The Art of Fielding is one of the most entertaining and enthralling character studies in recent years

    I know next to nothing about baseball. Home runs, fouls, and bases loaded are pretty much the extent of my baseball knowledge. And, to be blunt, I pretty much think watching it is as entertaining as watching paint dry (please don’t hate me baseball fans). However, The Art of Fielding is probably one of the most entertaining and enthralling character studies released within the last couple years, especially since it’s a “book about baseball.” But it isn’t really. Yes, baseball is pretty much the main vein down the center of the novel’s various plot points, but it’s merely treated as a plot device to set the intense character study into motion.




    The novel surrounds the Wettish Harpooners, a Division III baseball team in Wisconsin. A small, but passionate, school just off of Lake Michigan. Although the book focuses on five characters, the main character (in terms of plot) is Henry Skrimshander. (SIDE NOTE: Harbach has a knack for naming characters.) He is the first introduced and probably the one that has to change the most. That’s apparent from the first page. When we meet him, he’s a scrawny, somewhat dull, and naive shortstop, who is, in all intensive purposes, a savant at the position. He has potential, and Mike Schwartz sees that potential. So is born the complicated love/hate relationship between the players. He is the saving grace of the Harpooners. He makes them work harder, play better, and most importantly, win. By his junior year, he becomes the foundation of the team and even begins to perk the interest of scouts looking to bring him into the majors. However, like all great novels, the good times never last. Soon, the player that was once the key to success becomes the straw that may break the team’s back. All of which unfolds in a gorgeous, sharp prose that makes the action of the game more entertaining than in reality.

    Both times he double-clutched and made a soft, hesitant throw. Instead of rifle shots fired at a target, they felt like doves released from a box.

    fieldingjpg-0111d8fb4f866bbcThe rest of the character seemingly fill in around Henry. There’s Owen Dunne, also known as Buddha, his gay roommate, and teammate, who casually wisps through life as casually as he hits a ball. The president of the school, Guert Affenlight, a grown man who is as confused as a college freshman, and his daughter Pella, a girl whose confusion mirrors both her father and Henry’s as she navigates the world after the demise of her marriage, complete the cast of characters. The ensemble is gracefully woven through storylines that concern each other, themselves, and of course, the team. Though the daunting 500-pages almost seem excessive, Harbach doesn’t waste single sentence. Every page helps move the characters forward.




    However, the novel never goes out of Harbach’s control. It’s shockingly well thought out for a debut. Harbach knows where he wants the characters go and guides them there with ease, whether it’s 60-year-old Affenlight, whose obsession with Owen begins to affect his effectiveness as president or Pella’s journey to be both independent from her husband and her father. Even though the book covers several threads and decisions that characters make and how they affect their lives, it’s always the relationship between Schwartz and Skrimashander that the book seems to come back to. They affect each other directly and indirectly, and these effects affect the people around them. These effects are carefully noted and defined by Harbach, but he doesn’t give too much away. If you’re a reader that thrives on learning how a character is changing rather than being told, then the dynamism of The Art of Fielding ensemble will be a buffet. It seems that everyone has something to prove an obstacle to tackle. It’s almost as if Harbach is obsessed with time lost and dreams deferred.

    The Art of Fielding isn’t going to be a book that everyone loves or, in some cases, even likes. However, I think that’s attributed to that fact that not everyone is built to read a book that doesn’t have a tangible destination. If you had to choose one, it would probably be the maturity of the characters, although choosing one would be unnecessary. We’re not supposed to know the destination, just as the characters don’t know what the future holds.

    8.5/10

    The Art of Fielding is available on paperback, hardcover, and e-book on Amazon!

  • Femme Fatale Friday: Halsey

    Femme Fatale Friday: Halsey

    15886474931_b025898f68_b

    Every Friday we will be honoring the stunning Female musicians who have caught our eyes, ears, and hearts (we know that sounded corny, but roll with it). This week we’re featuring Halsey!


    I first discovered Halsey at WTSR, the radio station I’m the manager of (open your mind and bang your f**king head!). The second I read indie pop, Brooklyn, and feminist, I was sold. I spun what the reviewer said was the best song on the record, and I was hooked.

    Who is she

    Ashley Frangipane was born in New Jersey, though she identifies more with New York. Her stage name is an anagram of her first name and a street that she frequented as a teenager in Brooklyn. Halsey is biracial, which doesn’t effect her music, but it lends to her gorgeous racially ambiguous features. She was raised around music, playing the violin, viola, cello, and eventually, the acoustic guitar. She went to school for songwriting and creative writing. At 18, she turned to music to pay her rent.

    What has she done/What is she going to do

    She started off posting covers on her personal YouTube channel, which has been deleted (although, thanks to the power of the internet some of those were saved). This eventually led to her recording her original songs and posting “Ghost” on SoundCloud, which got her the attention of Astralwerks who released her debut EP Room 93. It included a remastered version of “Ghost” and features the lead single of her up coming album “Hurricane.”

    portrait_halsey-640x427Why you should listen to her

    It seems that dark indie pop has become such a staple in today’s music that we’ve come to the point that the style is being mimicked by lesser pop artists. Halsey just takes the genre and pushes it further. She forgets the upbeat pop beats that seems to be drawing people and goes straight for the moody beats

    Where should you start

    Since we’ve only seen 5 songs, it’s not difficult to say that Halsey is pretty consistent in quality when it comes to her music. However, I think the clear place to start in her repertoire is the chilling and heartbreaking “Ghost,” which comes off as a moody indie pop entry, but cuts in heartbreaking with lyrics like:

    I like the sad eyes, bad guys
    Mouth full of white lies
    Kiss me in the corridor,
    But quick to tell me goodbye.

    and has a catchy hook and chorus that will stick with you like an earworm of a more traditional pop song. If you’re looking for a song that highlights Halsey’s power as a vocalist, then “Trouble (stripped)” will outline her raspy vocals. She holds the power in her words rather than the strength in her voice. “Trouble” outlines the emotion of the song – “Let’s cause a little trouble/Oh, you make me feel so weak/I bet you kiss your knuckles/Right before they touch my cheek” – with a faint, but significant voice that will quickly seep into your skin and stay with you. That’s why she deserves to be this week’s Femme Fatale.

  • Jamie xx Album Review — “In Colour” is a massive achievement

    Jamie xx Album Review — “In Colour” is a massive achievement

    jamie xx in colour album review

    If you’re expecting a traditional electronic album with deep thrashing bass and lyrics talking about “poppin’ molly” from Jamie xx’s debut solo album, then you’re in for a surprise, and a damned good one at that. Producer Jamie Smith, best known as part of The xx (a band that I believe is extremely underappreciated), has been rumored to be working on a solo project for some time now. However, it wasn’t until he released his debut single “Far Nearer” that we understood the necessity of a solo project. Well, now it’s here, and it was well worth the 5-year wait.

    The xx thrived on how close minimalism can bring you to perfection. That’s what their debut album was, a collection of perfect pop songs the showed the restraint that the group can practice when songwriting. Naturally, Jamie xx brings that restraint to his solo project, which matches his work with the xx, if not surpasses it. Despite the similar minimalist styles of In Colour and the xx, that’s where the line connecting the two projects ends. The reason Jamie xx surpasses his work on The xx is not because he replicates it. In fact, it’s because he diverts away from it that it works. He takes risks with the project, similar risks that Twenty One Pilots took with Blurryface.  However, instead of a genre-bending sound, he bends the time period that the album homages to, instead.

    Essentially In Colour is an album that doesn’t adhere to the guidelines of a particular era. In fact, Smith has even said:

    There’s some classic tracks that are classic because they are of an era, but I like trying to make things classic because you can listen to them at any time, and they could be from any time.

    – Interview with Smith from Fader

    That also explains what makes the album all the more impressive. Behind the minimalism of the album, is a blast of color that hits you, grabs you, and doesn’t let you go until the last track plays. Hidden within each song is an impressive build of loops that introduce a new element, then repeat it until it builds into a gorgeously produced track that, essentially, builds on the previous one. Then, the unifying theme of the London club scene takes the build that the track set in place and creates a narrative that emotionally ebbs and flows with the music.

    The album begins with “Gosh, a hands on the table groove that homages old school house without quite ripping it off. Smith’s formula of starting off with a single loop, which then builds as the song progresses is established in this track.

    Despite the incredibly high opening and closing to the album, it’s the run of songs starting with “SeeSaw” and ending with “I Know There’s Gonna Be” that makes this album one of the best albums of the year, and maybe even the decade. That’s where you truly realize what a genius in production that Jamie xx is. There’s so much depth to his music that you can dive into it head first and get lost.

    “Obvs, which is one of the few steel drum tracks in Smith’s repertoire, breathes with a deep bass line that supports the soft hums and repeated melody of the steel drum loop. With “I Know There’s Gonna Be,  another steel drum track, Smith proves that the minimalistic approach to music can defy genres. The album brings together three very different artists from three very different genres. At the base is Smith’s minimalist track, which is further enhanced by Jamaican dancehall vocalist Popcaan’s sample-like hook. Then Young Thug supply’s a sing-songy, pop rap that just exudes the joy when all inhibitions are released and you let music flow over you.

    Where the album soars is Smith collaborations with his bandmates. The tracks supply the framework for the album. They outline the desolation that one feels in the club scene. “SeeSaw” features Romy Croft as a victim to the viciousness of relationships in a club, while “Stranger in the Room” discusses the stripped identity.

    The album’s high point comes in the song “Loud Places,” which was done in collaboration with his xx bandmates. The song is truly the triumph of the album. It’s a soaring anthem of the desperation of our generation to constantly have stimulation. Romy, whose voice stands out beautifully on the track, sings “I go to loud places/to search for someone/to be quiet with/who will take me home.” The song outlines the constant struggle between introversion and extroversion. Society appreciates the latter, while many desire the former. With the slow build of loops eventually ending with an incredible chant that is broken by the heartbreaking final lyric, the track proves itself to be the best of the album.

    What you take from In Colour is up to you. Do you take it at face value of a well-constructed dance record? Or, perhaps, you delved deeper and saw a producer’s paradise? Some people will connect to the narrative of it all, while others will completely ignore it and let the music wash over you. When you appreciate all these elements, you get what I see: the best album of the year and perhaps the decade.

    In Colour is available on CD, vinyl, and digital download on Amazon!

  • Annihilation Book Review — A tense, fast-paced sci-fi thriller

    Annihilation Book Review — A tense, fast-paced sci-fi thriller

    By the time we were ready to cross the border, we knew everything…and we knew nothing.

    That’s the best way to describe reading Jeff VanderMeer’s psychological thriller and first book of the Southern Reach Trilogy. Everything and nothing is as it seems as a 4-person expedition makes their way into the mysterious Area X, an abandoned stretch of US Coastline that has been reclaimed by nature (or something quite the opposite). The group, which consists of four women — all unnamed, is the twelfth expedition into the fabled area, which is as mysterious as the organization that sent them there.

    The Biologist, our narrator, is a stoic, unsuspecting heroine of the journey who is following in the footsteps of her husband, who was in the previous expedition that had returned as shells of their former selves before all suddenly dying of cancer. The book is said to be her journal that all expedition members are expected to maintain. This gives us one of the first points of brilliance from VanderMeer. Her incredulous experience is enhanced by “her” honest writing. However, whether or not it’s honest is up for debate. I mean, it is her account of the entire ordeal. She even contradicts herself in some parts of her journal. The book uses the unreliable narrator trope to perfection.




    Our unreliable narrator also makes it seem that she’s the most sane of the group. There’s the group leader, the psychologist, who she paints to be a suspicious observer of the other three. The anthropologist is merely seen as a useless tool, and the surveyor as brute. She makes herself out to be the heroine, but whether or not she is is unknown.

    The novel has been marketed as a psychological thriller, or, perhaps, horror would be better suited. But I believe the novel is Loftcraftian in nature. It doesn’t rely on terrible gore, although it’s certainly graphic enough. Instead, VanderMeer uses the fear of the unknown to his advantage. He uses it to build suspense — deafening, aching suspense — that makes you fear what’s around the corner (or the next page).

    As the expedition goes from bad to worse, mysteries are uncovered, sometimes solved, but overall, VanderMeer maintains a veil over everything going on in Area X. I will warn you, if you’re a book reader that needs to get answers before the last page, then this isn’t the read for you. Those mysteries are what drive the book. They’re what induce horror into you. However, the book has enough twists and thrills to keep you entertained through out.

    One the other hand, if there is a downfall to the novel, it is its leading character. It’s not that the biologist is underdeveloped. Quite the opposite, actually. The action of the story is often halted to give her development through her experiences. Frankly, that development proves that she’s just a boring character and borderline unlikeable. The skilled and spontaneous surveyor ends up being the most intriguing, or simply most human character of the team. VanderMeer’s characterization of the biologist as the typical introvert geek who’d rather be with a tidal pool than with people just feels inherently unrelatable.




    The weak main character aside, Annihilation is a quick and entertaining read that keeps you guessing till the very last page. VanderMeer’s writing may be long and, at times, tedious, but it will hook you and never let you go. It’s that dragged out nature that gives you a sense of dread, even when you feel safe. Truly, there’s no refuge in the pages of the novel.

    Annihilation is just the first novel of the Southern Reach Trilogy; however, even 200 pages into the entire series as a whole, I have no idea where it could go. As I said, Annihilation created as many mysteries as it solved, but just how many there are in total is yet to be answered.

    Get Annihilation in paperback, hardcover, or e-book on Amazon!

  • LIVE BLOG: 2015 Emmy Nominations Reactions

    LIVE BLOG: 2015 Emmy Nominations Reactions

    2015 emmy nominations reactions

    The 2015 Emmy Nominations are being announced live this morning (Thursday, July 16th) at 11:30 AM by Uzo Aduba (Orange Is the New Black) and Cat Dealy (So You Think You Can Dance). The nominations honor the best of this year in television from both comedy, drama, miniseries, and TV movie.

    Check out our live reactions here while the nominations are announced. Then stay tuned to Smash Cut to see our full reactions and predictions.

    Take a look at our predictions and tell us who you think (and want) to be nominated!


    [liveblog]

     

  • Track Review: “Time Piece” – Ripple Green

    Track Review: “Time Piece” – Ripple Green

    Sometimes it’s hard to go anywhere with a review other than the most blunt statement, and in the case of the Oklahoma-based band Ripple Green’s new single “Time Piece,” all I can say is that it’s damn good rock. They’re not necessarily reinventing the genre here, but they’re taking the best of what’s been made and adding a personal flair that makes it an entertaining listen.

    The band believed that “creativity and expression through music could provide an escape from the mundane life they faced in the plains.” That’s what time piece is. It’s escapism music. Much of jam rock is. It’s hard not to draw comparisons to Phish or Portugal the Man—two completely different bands that have both mastered the genre. Ripple Green has taken the formula and infused it with personal lyrics that as they say:
    “turned into an account of how people’s lives revolve around other individuals over time.”

    ripple green timepieceFrom the chorus to the hook, the song is pretty much an earworm in itself. It all stems from such a seemingly unsuspecting chord progression, however it sticks with you to the point that you’ll be humming the tune all week. Plus, Joel Parks’ vocals just enhance the bluegrass infused sound that the band has and makes it all the more catchy.

    The band has described their new EP “Timepiece” as:

    A step out of adolescence for Ripple Green that came from spending half of last year in Europe. It signifies moments filled with adventure and a grateful shift in approach to their songwriting.

    As for the video, it’s just an expression of joy, youth, and creativity that was all filmed during the 2014 summer solstice. It just reinforces the band’s sound and origins: escape. Definitely look out for these guys in the future.

    “The three members of Ripple Green met during Kindergarten in small town Oklahoma. Their formative years were spent being mischievous friends who built slingshots, climbed trees, and made short films. Soon, however, upon leaving Elementary school, the idea to form a band was spawned before any of the members owned or played their instruments. To them, creativity and expression through music could provide an escape from the mundane life they faced in the plains.”

    The Timepiece EP is due out on July 31st and is available for pre-sale on iTunes.