Awards

Could “Moonlight” Actually Upset “La La Land” at the Oscars?

The overarching story of awards season this year has to be La La Land's dominance from beginning to end. After winning a record-breaking seven Golden Globes and tying the record for the most Oscar nominations with 14, it seemed that Best Picture was a done deal. And I think it probably is. Smart pundits will put their money on La La Land because it did what it had to do at the precursors. It was nominated for Best Picture (or equivalent) at the BAFTAs, Golden Globes, and Producers Guild of American Awards – winning that latter two. It nabbed director, screenplay, editing, and acting nominations at the . And it's doing incredibly at the box office. So why do I think there is room for doubt?

Well, there are a couple things.

Check Out: “La La Land” Movie Review: A surprisingly profound story about dreams and disappointments

The first thing is that it was snubbed for Best Cast at the Screen Actors Guild Awards. Now, a lot of pundits are saying it's because there really isn't much of a cast. I agree. Really, and are the only major players with John Legend having a small supporting role and and Rosemarie DeWitt barely registering. However, per SAG rules, the movie would have five credits. That is more than Beasts of No Nation, Boyhood, Hotel Rwanda, and Best Picture winner Million Dollar Baby had. Granted, Million Dollar Baby got nominations for all three of its actors at the . More than that, though, these are actors voting on these awards. Not critics or Oscar pundits. They don't look that deep into things.

If the love for the movie was that strong, wouldn't it have still been nominated? Especially over Captain Fantastic, which barely registered at the Oscars. The reason I bring this up is because of the pretty solid statistic that the SAG awards have. No movie has gone on to win the Oscar for Best Picture without a SAG ensemble nomination since 1995 when Braveheart won. Even last year, when people were so sure that The Revenant was going to win, it lost to Spotlight. 

Even that isn't the reason I don't think it's going to win.

The first real reason is the way the Academy votes on Best Picture. They use a preferential ballot to vote, which means instead of voting for one film, voters rank the nine nominees. A movie needs 50% of the vote to win. The first round, only the voters' number one vote is counted. If no movie reaches the threshold, the movie with the LEAST number one votes is eliminated. The ballots with the eliminated movie at number one will instead have their number two movie counted. If no movie reaches the threshold again, the same process is repeated.

This means, that you don't just need a lot of number one votes. Though, obviously, they help. You also need a lot of number two and three votes. This is because, if voting movies past the first round, then those votes will count as number one votes. This is the same process the Producers Guild of America Awards use (the best predictor for the Oscars). More on that later.

Check Out: “Moonlight” Movie Review: An instant classic and landmark in film history

I think there's no doubt that La La Land will get a lot of number one votes. There is even a possibility that it'll get enough votes to win in the first round. However, if it doesn't, I think Moonlight will be able to sneak in and take it all. The Producers Guild went for La La Land. And they've been nearly infallible since switching to the preferential ballot. However, I think the frontrunner backlash is going to affect La La Land more than any other movie.

I've found that people love both movies. However, with this La La Land backlash, I'm finding less and less people that just like La La Land. The issue with La La Land compared to other frontrunner backlashes is that it has broken a lot of records, which brought up the sentiment that it's good, but not THAT good. I think that's going to drive a lot of people to rank it lower on their ballot. Which, is going to allow Moonlight to slip in and win it all. Is it plausible? Yes. Likely? Probably not. But I think if any film is going to upset La La Land, it's Moonlight and that's how it's going to do it.

Karl Delossantos

Hey, I'm Karl, founder and film critic at Smash Cut. I started Smash Cut in 2014 to share my love of movies and give a perspective I haven't yet seen represented. I'm also an editor at The New York Times, a Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic, and a member of the Online Film Critics Society.

Leave a Comment
Published by
Karl Delossantos

Recent Posts

No Other Land is the most important documentary of our time | movie review

No Other Land follows a Palestinian activist as he documents the destruction of his community… Read More

1 month ago

Surreal dramedy The Life of Chuck ponders life and death | TIFF 2024

TIFF 2024 | The Life of Chuck follows an enigmatic man starting as a surrealist… Read More

2 months ago

Diabolically fun horror Heretic will make you believe | TIFF 2024

A pair of young Mormon missionaries find themselves at the center of a sinister plot… Read More

2 months ago

Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield charm and fall in love in We Live In Time | TIFF 2024

Moving back and forth in their history, We Live In Time follows a couple through… Read More

2 months ago

Strange Darling, a thriller to die for | movie review

While it begins as a cat-and-mouse thriller, Strange Darling evolves (and genre-bends) into a psychological… Read More

2 months ago

Dìdi is a love letter to an Asian-American childhood | movie review

Dìdi is an autobiographical romp through the life of a shy 13-year-old Taiwanese-American as he… Read More

3 months ago