Karl Delossantos

  • ‘Split’ review — James McAvoy gives the performance of his career

    ‘Split’ review — James McAvoy gives the performance of his career

    Split is an incredibly tense and well-made thriller that features fantastic performances by James McAvoy and Anya Taylor Joy.

    M. Night Shyamalan is back, for better or worst. The last Shyamalan movie I watched was 2008’s The Happening, so you could understand my hesitance going into this movie. Although I heard mostly good things about his last movie The Visit, dissociative identity disorder or multiple personalities is a hard subject to pull off well. Of course, you get into the dilemma of portraying mental illness as a danger to society. However, Shyamalan toes the line gently with Split

    The movie opens with a slow dolly shot of Casey (Anya Taylor-Joy) at a classmate’s birthday party in a suburban mall. She’s contemplative, uncomfortable, and obviously doesn’t belong. After her ride fails to show up, she hitches a ride with two of her classmates, Claire (Haley Lu Richardson) and Marcia (Jessica Sula). However, their driver, Claire’s father, doesn’t show up in the driver’s seat. As the camera menacing approaches the father packing gifts in the trunk, we realize that we are watching from the perspective of a malevolent force. A strange man (James McAvoy) steps into the car instead of Claire’s father. After knocking out Claire and Marcia, he turns to Casey, then we cut to the main title sequence.




    This scene is a perfect study of the patience and grasp of tension Shyamalan has in this movie. He lets shots linger. Like when the mysterious stranger approaches the car or the opening shot of Casey. Coupled with the brilliant cinematography by Mike Gioulakis, who shot 2015’s It Follows to great success, the opening is an incredible practice in tension and visual storytelling, which is something that we haven’t seen from Shyamalan since 2002’s Signs.

    And it’s not just the opening scene that is filled with tension. All of Split has this impressive slow-burning dread that underlies every scene. It makes you want to turn away from the screen. It’s a combination of the creative elements that Shyamalan was able to pull together that pulls it off. Specifically, the simple production design of the bunker, which feels like an endless maze of tunnels, the heavy bass of the score, the cinematography, and the performances come together to create an ominous mood. When we start getting into the meat of the story some of that goes away, but generally, the movie keeps tightening and tightening until the last 20 minutes.

    The girls’ captor is revealed to have Dissociative Identity Disorder, which means 23 different personalities control this one body — a spirited nine-year-old, an obsessive-compulsive brute, a disciplined and proper English woman. The main alter, Barry is a fashion designer with a generally happy attitude and motivation to get past his condition. His scenes with his therapist Dr. Karen Fletcher (Betty Buckley) have nearly as much tension as the scenes with the three girls as they attempt to escape from the bunker he brought them to. It’s difficult to talk about why the use of DID as a plot device is justified without edging into spoilers. However, this is a movie that is recontextualized by its ending — for the better.

    James McAvoy is remarkable. Not only because he has to play a menagerie characters, but because the way he distinguishes between each is so specific. When he walks into a room you can tell just by his posture which alter he is. And when he becomes each alter, he inhabits them wholly in his speech, facial expressions, and even the way he moves his jaw. Though he’s certainly playing to the back of the theater, it works because of the recontextualization of the movie.

    That’s not to take away from the other performances. Betty Buckley is marvelous and sure-footed as Dr. Fletcher and Anya Taylor-Joy gives a complex, yet nuanced performance as Casey. But you just can’t help but be both drawn in and terrified by McAvoy.

    Split is built like a mystery that allows the audience to piece together the clues without tipping its ultimate hand.





    We know and fully expect a plot twist in an M. Night Shyamalan movie. However, the question becomes whether it enhances or destroys the plot. And honestly, it does both. For those who are confused or put off by the movie’s

    Up until the last 20 or so minutes, Split is a tense, tightly directed thriller that would probably have ended up among my favorite movies at the end of the year. It is still a really great movie, but the ending nearly takes all the momentum it had going. Does it make it a bad movie? No. It’s still a good movie. While Shyamalan is known for his self-indulgence – some low brow humor and of course an appearance in the movie – he shows restraint for most of the movie. However, nearly all of its success has to be put on James McAvoy who should hopefully finally get the roles and respect he deserves. If anything, watch Split for the masterclass in acting happening on the screen.

    ★★★ out of 5



    Split is available on Blu-Ray and Digital HD on Amazon!

  • Final 2017 Oscar Nominations Predictions

    Final 2017 Oscar Nominations Predictions

    And the nominees are… We take our best guess at who will be nominated at the 2017 Oscars

    The nominations for the 89th Academy Awards are next Tuesday and we’ll finally know where this wacky awards season leads to. This year has been one of the most confusing awards seasons in recent memories. However, we do know one thing: La La Land will dominate the awards. If my predictions hold, La La Land will lead with thirteen nominations followed by Arrival with twelve. The two other films best positioned to win the top prize, Moonlight and Manchester by the Sea, should reap eight and six nominations each.

    This year, I tried to make more bold choices. Among the boldest are Ryan Reynolds being nominated for Deadpool, The Handmaiden showing up in a couple technical categories, and a near shut-out for Silence.

    Check out my final 2017 Oscar nominations predictions below!

    Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling in La La Land




    Best Picture
    Arrival
    Fences
    Hacksaw Ridge
    Hell or High Water
    Hidden Figures
    La La Land
    Lion
    Manchester by the Sea
    Moonlight

    I think this category more than any should go as planned. I don’t foresee any surprises except for maybe a nomination for Deadpool. While the last two years there have been eight nominations, Hidden Figures will probably sneak in and make it nine.

    Best Director
    Denis Villeneuve, Arrival
    Damien Chazelle, La La Land
    Garth Davis, Lion
    Kenneth Lonergan, Manchester by the Sea
    Barry Jenkins, Moonlight

    While a lot of people think that the DGA nomination for Garth Davis (Lion) was a fluke. I was predicting him to get in even before that. He’ll be the Ben Zeitlan or Lenny Abrahamson of this year.

    Amy Adams in Arrival



    Best Actor
    Ryan Reynolds, Deadpool
    Denzel Washington, Fences
    Andrew Garfield, Hacksaw Ridge
    Ryan Gosling, La La Land
    Casey Affleck, Manchester by the Sea

    Yes, you read that right. I think Ryan Reynolds will be nominated for Deadpool. Even then, it’s probably a long shot and Viggo Mortensen will be nominated for Captain Fantastic. But, no guts no glory, right?

    Best Actress
    Amy Adams, Arrival
    Isabelle Huppert, Elle
    Meryl Streep, Florence Foster Jenkins
    Natalie Portman, Jackie
    Emma Stone, La La Land

    This category should go as planned. Meryl Streep cemented her place with her incredible Golden Globes speech.

    Best Supporting Actor
    Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water
    Hugh Grant, Florence Foster Jenkins
    Lucas Hedges, Manchester by the Sea
    Dev Patel, Lion
    Mahershala Ali, Moonlight

    Other than Lucas Hedges, I think this category is locked. I can see him being snubbed for Aaron Taylor-Johnson after his shocking nomination at the Golden Globes.

    Best Supporting Actress
    Viola Davis, Fences
    Octavia Spencer, Hidden Figures
    Nicole Kidman, Lion
    Michelle Williams, Manchester by the Sea
    Naomie Harris, Moonlight

    This category has been consistent throughout the season. I don’t see why that would end with the Oscars.

    Viola Davis in Fences


    Best Original Screenplay
    20th Century Women
    Hell or High Water
    La La Land
    The Lobster
    Manchester by the Sea

    My big prediction for this category is 20th Century Women. It just feels like the type of movie to be nominated in this category. I’m also going out on a limp – a more sturdy one – for The Lobster.

    Best Adapted Screenplay
    Arrival
    Fences
    Hidden Figures
    Moonlight
    Lion

    This was one of the harder categories to predict. Nocturnal Animals is the wild card here.

    Best Film Editing
    Arrival
    Hell or High Water
    Hacksaw Ridge
    La La Land
    Moonlight

    I think Manchester by the Sea is going to take a hit by missing this Best Picture requirement.

    Best Cinematography
    Arrival
    Hacksaw Ridge
    La La Land
    Moonlight
    Silence

    My big prediction here is Hacksaw Ridge. However, war movies do well in this category so I felt like it would be a missed opportunity to leave it out.

    Moonlight Movie




    Best Production Design
    Arrival
    Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
    The Handmaiden
    Jackie
    La La Land

    Much like The Grandmaster a couple of years ago, The Handmaiden could be that foreign film ineligible for Best Foreign Language that makes up for it in the tech categories.

    Best Costume Design
    Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
    Florence Foster Jenkins
    The Handmaiden
    Jackie
    La La Land

    Again, The Handmaiden.

    Best Makeup and Hairstyling
    Deadpool
    Florence Foster Jenkins
    A Man Called Ove

    A lot of people are going with Hail, Caesar or Star Trek Beyond. However, I think this is the perfect place for Deadpool to get some love.

    Best Score
    Jackie
    La La Land
    Lion
    Moonlight
    Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

    No surprises here!

    Felicity Jones in Rogue One



    Best Original Song
    “Runnin’” – Hidden Figures
    “City of Stars” – La La Land
    “Audition” – La La Land
    “How Far I’ll Go” – Moana
    “Can’t Stop the Feeling” – Trolls

    After “City of Stars” making a romp of the early awards, I think the Academy will include “Audition,” which could pave the way for Lin Manuel Miranda to EGOT.

    Best Sound Editing
    13 Hours
    Arrival

    Deepwater Horizon
    Hacksaw Ridge
    Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

    The sound categories are notoriously hard to predict. While I’m confident about most of it, I’m taking a huge guess in including 13 Hours.

    Best Sound Mixing
    Arrival
    Hacksaw Ridge
    The Jungle Book
    La La Land
    Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

    Damien Chazelle’s last movie Whiplash won in this category. He should easily do it again with La La Land.

    Best Visual Effects
    Arrival
    Doctor Strange
    The Jungle Book
    Kubo and the Two Strings
    Rogue One: A Star Wars Story

    I think (and really hope) Kubo and the Two Strings makes history as the first animated movie to be nominated in this category.

    Best Animated Film
    Kubo and the Two Strings
    Moana
    My Life As A Zucchini
    The Red Turtle
    Zootopia

    Pixar is probably sitting this year out.

    Kubo and the Two Strings




    Best Foreign Language Film
    A Man Called Ove
    Land of Mine
    My Life As A Zucchini
    The Salesman
    Toni Erdmann

    This category is pretty much set. Land of Mine could be bumped out for Tanna, though.

    Best Documentary
    13th
    Cameraperson
    I Am Not Your Negro
    OJ: Made In America
    Tower

    This is a stacked category this year. While Weiner or The Eagle Huntress or Gleason is the smart choice. My gut says it’s gonna be Tower. 

    Best Animated Short Film
    The Head Vanishes
    Inner Workings
    Pear and Cider Cigarettes
    Pearl
    Piper

    Best Live Action Short Film
    Graffiti
    Nocturne in Black
    Silent Nights
    Timecode
    The Way of Tea

    Best Documentary Short Subject
    4.1 Miles
    Extremis
    Frame 394
    Joe’s Violin
    The White Helmets

    What do you think of my nominations? Where am I completely wrong? Let me know in the comments!

  • Deepwater Horizon review — Visual effects shine through the mud and oil

    Deepwater Horizon review — Visual effects shine through the mud and oil

    Visually stunning and emotionally resonant, Deepwater Horizon is the kind of “based on a true story” movie that honors its subject, but is also eminently watchable.

    Disaster movies are already hard enough to pull off. But disaster movies based on a real event are even harder. You have to balance the expectations of the genre with reverence for the victims. United 93 is probably the most recent example of a movie that was actually able to successfully pull this off. Paul Greengrass isn’t concerned with the facts, though he certainly gets them all right. Instead he takes a humanistic approach in telling the story. While Peter Berg doesn’t quite reach those heights, Deepwater Horizon is a more than solid depiction of a horrific event that shows reverence for the victims and indicts those at fault.

    It’s pretty fantastic that the movie actually works. Not only is it a disaster movie based on a real event. It is probably one of the most highly publicized disasters in U.S. history this decade. Because of that, the audience has an opinion going into the movie. They have an idea of the facts. So, it was important for the movie to either present something new or to present it in an interesting way. Berg was able to do both.

    Deepwater Horizon tells the story of the worst oil industry disaster in U.S. history. It claimed the lives of 11 people and caused incalculable damage to the environment of the Gulf of Mexico. The movie follows the men and women aboard the oil rig Deepwater Horizon in the time just before and after the explosion.




    We are introduced to the members of the crew of the rig before they set off to board. This includes chief electronics technician Mike Williams (Mark Wahlberg), dynamic positioning officer Andrea Fleytas (Gina Rodriguez), and crew chief Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell), affectionately known as Mr. Jimmy. Berg uses the beginning of the movie to place the crew in their lives outside the rig. Mike “spends time” with his wife and helps his daughter with a project – a little expositional setup, but it’s actually kind of cute. Andrea tries to get her pet project Mustang to work. It’s all to serve the story and the real-life people behind it. Berg doesn’t forget that he’s telling someone’s story.

    Mark Wahlberg in Deepwater HorizonWhen we get on the rig, we are introduced to Donald Vidrine (John Malkovich), who is quickly established as the villain. In real life, it was determined that Vidrine was following orders from higher-ups at BP. However, in the movie, he is the representative of the entire company. Of course, this happens a lot to simplify a story. However, anyone that knows anything about this story knows that BP came away with a slap on the wrist and a divot in their earnings report. It’s a movie with something on its mind. That something is to remind people that the eleven deaths and billions of dollars in damages resulted in no change and no accountability from the company. The idea of corporate greed is not a new one. However, Deepwater Horizon shows the horrifying possibilites brought on by it.

    The first half of the movie largely sets up the chain of events and decisions that caused the disaster. I really appreciated the screenwriters’ care to not dumb down the events. They showed trust in the audience to understand the mechanics. Terms like PSI and negative pressure are thrown around but don’t feel like jargon. Actually, much of the first act feels almost like it could be a documentary. The movie takes care to give you detail by showing facts and labels on screen. However, it’s the dialogue that makes it shine. Screenwriters Matthew Michael Carnahan and Matthew Sand actually wrote dialogue the way that people speak. Conversations switch subjects and drift. Characters recall past events. It’s the kind of screenwriting we need more of.




    However, from the second that the rig actually blows, there is no stopping the momentum of the film. Peter Berg is able to create a caustic environment that makes you feel the heat of the fire and the power of the explosions. Visually the film is stunning. It is a new high in terms of photo-realistic effects. Balls of fire, dangerous jets of mud, and sudden jolts of pressure actually feel dangerous. That’s a hard thing to achieve in an action movie. It makes you feel like the characters are vulnerable. Granted, they are on a flaming glorified boat that is 46 miles off the coast.

    Mark Wahlberg gives a surprisingly strong performance here, which is something I never thought I’d say. Though for much of the movie he is the macho hero with near superman abilities. But when he is given the chance to emote, it’s heartbreaking. Another highlight is Kurt Russell as the stern crew chief who takes BP head on. However, John Malkovich as the sneering BP executive steals the entire movie. He’s the kind of slithery corporate puppet that is needed for the audience to direct its anger at. And though he might as well be a mustache twirling villain, it works. He’s performing to the back of the theater and the movie is all better for it.

    Deepwater Horizon is deeply entertaining, visually stunning, and emotional. Though it has its flaws, it also has moments of astonishment that show it for what it is: a technical achievement. The visual effects feat of the second half is reason enough to see it. However, it has a surprising emotional depth that makes it more than just a disaster movie. Even then, what makes it eminently rewatchable is this thrilling story that you can’t imagine being real.

    ★★★½ out of 5



    Deepwater Horizon is available on Blu-Ray and Digital HD on Amazon!

  • Interstellar Movie Review — Christopher Nolan’s most epic, but human movie yet

    Interstellar Movie Review — Christopher Nolan’s most epic, but human movie yet

    Interstellar is a visual masterpiece that has a human touch that propels it to greatness. It is perhaps one of the best space movies ever made.

    Christopher Nolan isn’t one known to be taciturn when it comes to his movies. Even his smaller movies like Momento have grand structures bolstering their simple plots. However, Interstellar is easily is first brush with the epic — unless you consider the full Dark Knight trilogy as one. On paper, it should not work. A sweeping narrative covering different times and worlds would be eaten up by audiences. That’s why Gravity found so much success financially and at the Oscars. But Nolan does something completely different with Interstellar. He introduces science in a way that isn’t watered down or ignored. His film, according to astrophysicists, is completely plausible. Though that fact makes the movie a hard one to digest for viewers, the end result is an incredible study of human nature and our desire to survive.

    Food is running out. The world is becoming overpopulated. The Yankees look nothing more than a high school baseball team. A crop blight is threatening the very existence of the human race. Nolan drops into this terrifyingly realistic future plagued with dust storms and the risk of the world simply ending within grasp. With this, the nation turns its attention to farmers and away from the sciences and engineers to save the world.

    Check Out: “Sleeping Giants” Book Review: A Unique, Engaging Sci-fi Thriller




    However, Joseph Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) who was once a pilot for NASA, maintains his faith in STEM. After a dust storm, a mysterious gravitational disturbance leads him back to the formerly disbanded agency. He discovers that NASA, led by Dr. Brand (Nolan regular Michael Caine) and his daughter Dr. Amelia Brand (Anne Hathaway) have discovered a wormhole. “One system with three potential worlds,” as Amelia puts. it. Something, or someone, has given the human race a chance to live by presenting them with potential new planets to call home.

    Cooper is given the seemingly possible decision to leave his children forever, potentially, or save the humanity from extinction. Choosing the latter, he embarks into an incredible mission on the ship Endurance. He, along with Amelia, Dr. Doyle (Wes Bently), and Dr. Romilly (David Gyasi) set off to assess the three worlds to choose where to start a new civilization.

    Back on earth, Murphy Cooper (Jessica Chastain), who grows up while her father is gone, begins to help Dr. Brand determine the formula to get humans off of earth in a mass exodus.

    While wormholes and other worlds seem like the work of science fiction, the science is very real. Though throughout the movie it sometimes gets a little confusing, with a little thinking you can piece it together. Essentially, it’s the Neil DeGrasse Tyson of movies. The science is explained in a non-condescending way.

    interstellar movie review




    One of the most surprising elements of Interstellar is not the story or the science, but the sentimentality. It’s shockingly emotional and often heartbreaking. In fact, parts of it gutted me. Whether it’s surprising because of the director or the premise is anybody’s guess. However, the grasp it has on humanity is both refreshing and welcome. Especially in the science fiction genre, a human factor is usually missing. But Nolan and the screenplay exhibit human nature for all its beauty and destruction.

    We have an innate desire to survive. That’s why the people on earth in Interstellar begin to lose faith in the dream to leave the planet. They are thinking of how they can solve the problems on Earth. The very idea of the movie is thinking of a way to save our race. However, the movie explores the selfish motivations we also innately have. The way it is explored is surprising and devastating.

    But it’s not just the screenplay and direction that exudes that. The ensemble was tasked with accessing emotions that humans would actually feel in these situations. Overall, the entire cast is phenomenal. However, there are three standouts for me. The first is Matthew McConaughey. I think it’s very unfortunate that he won his Oscar for Dallas Buyers Club. Not to take away from that performance. His performance in Interstellar is an incredible meditation on one of the hardest questions for humans: how much will you sacrifice for the greater good. There is no better way to show this than when he is watching messages from his kids as the years go by. This is the best performance of his career.

    Check Out: “Arrival” Movie Review: One of the Best Sci-Fi Movies of the Decade




    The other two performances that stood out were the two actresses that portrayed Murph. Mackenzie Foy breaks any stigma surrounding child actors with a really naturalistic and heartbreaking performance. She has these knowing gazes that foreshadow the scientific curiosity that follows her throughout her life. Jessica Chastain is an incredible presence as the older Murph. She carries over the knowing gazes, but adds the emotional baggage of years of abandonment by Coop. It is easily one of her most memorable performances.

    Masterpiece isn’t a word I take lightly. I’ve said it in probably two reviews on this blog (Boyhood and Moonlight – the former I’m less inclined to continue using that phrase). However, I’d call Interstellar a masterpiece of filmmaking. It’s as grand as it is introspective and as grounded as it is existential. By the end of the nearly three-hour running time — it goes by in a flash — you feel as if you’ve experienced something that is so rarely captured on film. If not for the plot or performances, watch it for the stunning visuals that haven’t been seen on the silver screen since perhaps 2001: A Space Odyssey. I think a decade from now we’re going to look back and wonder how we fell asleep to such a grand and sweeping epic. 

    ★★★★★ out of 5


    Get Interstellar on DVD, Blu-Ray, or Digital on Amazon or stream for free with Amazon Prime!

  • Best Books We Read In 2016

    Best Books We Read In 2016

    Because my commute involves two hours on three trains every morning, I was able to read 41 books this year. While I am very proud of this fact, I’m also sad about it. But these ten (well, eleven) books were well worth it. Here are my favorite books I read in 2016!




    books of 2016 wonder me before you

    10. Looking for Alaska (tie)

    I think the reason John Green has been such a lauded young adult author (save for Will Grayson, Will Grayson, which was one of the worst books I read this year) is his ability to subvert genre cliches. There is no better example of this than his first book, Looking for Alaska. While many of the stereotypes – awkward protagonist, too-cool-for-school – are there, by the end of the story they become fleshed out characters. To say this book surprised me is an understatement. While the first half can be a bit of a slog if you’re not a fan of young adult, the second half more than makes up for it. It’s heartbreaking, funny, and a surprisingly profound story about what it means to be alive.

    Get Looking for Alaska on Amazon >>>

    10. Me Before You (tie)

    “What truly struck me as an amazing facet of this novel was the decision that ultimately all the characters were faced with. Following the idiom of “If you love something, set it free,” Moyes leaves the reader with one question. What should you do if what makes the person you love truly happy completely destroys your own happiness and heart? I found this philosophical question to be truly engaging and entertaining throughout the story simply because I would not know what I would do. Is it better to instill happiness in a loved one by going without, or shall you be selfish as long as you are content? It may seem to some like a simple answer, but I truly enjoyed the journey of one woman coming to her own conclusion on this emotionally charged question in Me Before You.” – From our review

    Get Me Before You on Amazon >>>

    9. Wonder

    I think sometimes we don’t give our kids enough credit to understand more complex topics. That’s why I loved Zootopia so much. It tackled the topic of acceptance and race while maintaining a fun and entertaining tone. While Wonder certainly has its moments of emotion, overall it tells the story of Auggie in an idealistic tone. This is partially thanks to the characters that surround him. Their stories and backgrounds are there to help define Auggie as a person as much as the moments during the story. However, the point of Wonder is to teach the very important lesson of empathy. It does so without feeling heavy-handed – a turnoff for adult readers – or patronizing.

    Buy Wonder on Amazon >>>




    Books of 2016

    8. The Long and Faraway Gone

    Some of my favorite books are those disguised as other books. On the surface, The Long and Far Away gone is a crime novel. However, in reality, it’s a character study about two different people who had two life-changing experiences. While much of the book does focus on these experiences, those aren’t the focal points. Actually, these stories beget more questions than they do answers. The real focus is how these experiences shaped who the two main characters become. It asks the eternal question, “why me?”

    Get The Long and Faraway Gone on Amazon >>>

    7. Wonders of the Invisible World

    “And that is what is really refreshing about Wonders of the Invisible World is that Barzak doesn’t force Aiden’s personal storyline or the fantasy storyline into melodrama. In fact, for all the fantastical elements or potential for a soaring high school outcast story he keeps the story pretty lean. You’ll thank him for that in the end because it would pay a disservice to Aiden. His entire story is that he leads a non-fantastical life. The magic and curses and visions speak for themselves.”from our review

    Get Wonders of the Invisible World on Amazon >>>

    6. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

    Hilarious, witty, and damn entertaining, it’s no wonder that The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has captured the attention of the world. From a two-headed president of the galaxy to a depressed robot, Douglas Adams knows how to carve make ridiculous characters feel real. However, who really cares about character.The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy is easily the most hilarious book I’ve read. Setting up a joke in words in books is difficult, but Adams has comedic timing like no other. He’ll build up a joke for pages and hold his payoff until the perfect moment. It lands time and time again.

    Get The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy on Amazon >>>




    books of 2016

    5. The Power of the Dog

    At just over 500 pages, The Power of the Dog is by no means a short book. However, I read it almost one sitting. It is a thriller that you actually can’t put down. Don Winslow, who wrote Savages, which I also loved this year, mixes strong visual writing with gorgeous prose to put together this epic look at the drug war. When you look at that page count, you wouldn’t even realize the scope of the book. Covering decades and various characters and places, Winslow balances an interconnected world that feels like it exists in both time and space.

    Get The Power of the Dog on Amazon >>>

    4. Gone Girl

    I know that I was late on this train, but it was certainly worth the wait. Gone Girl is a thriller that uses its literary devices so elegantly that it becomes something different in itself. Specifically, the use of unreliable narrators is key to the story. However, Gillian Flynn isn’t obvious. You truly don’t know when someone is telling the truth. While the entire premise of the book has the making of a typical crime novel, Flynn is a fastidious writer. By the end of the book, you’ll be itching to go back to the beginning and seeing what you missed.

    Get Gone Girl on Amazon >>>

    3. Gravity

    I love books that are poetic with strong characters that are complex. Gravity is not one of those books. But that’s why I love it. Gravity is essentially the literary equivalent of a big-budget blockbuster that is actually good. I mean, it’s unsurprising considering it came from the author of the Rizzoli & Isles series. It’s one thing to write a book with a great plot, but the way Tess Gerritsen is able to paint images so adroitly that you can so easily visualize the entire book in your head. Why this movie wasn’t made before the Sandra Bullock one I have no idea, but this book is a great time to read. If you have someone who “doesn’t like to read,” start them off with this one.

    Get Gravity on Amazon >>>




    books of 2016

    2. Tell the Wolves I’m Home

    “Once in awhile a book comes around that reminds me why I love books. It reminds me why I love books about real people. It reminds me why I don’t need an epic to feel like I’ve lived an entire life through a book. “Tell The Wolves I’m Home” is one of those books, which is even more impressive considering it is a debut. Tell the Wolves I’m Home is an epic meditation on love, grief, change, and the necessity of growing up that disguises itself as a young adult coming-of-age. Though the tropes of our odd heroine, major life event, and life-changing relationship are there, Brunt uses them in a way that I don’t think has been committed to the page before.” – from our review

    Get Tell the Wolves I’m Home on Amazon >>>

    1. Then We Came to the End

    “Not everyone is going to love this book (just look at its Goodreads rating) because it’s not a book that’s written for everyone. It’s a book written for the subset of society that has alarms set for 7:30am and has to be at work at 9am. For the people that can’t wait to hear a piece of office gossip. It’s for the people look forward to noon when they get one hour of freedom. For those people, this book will be a hilarious and poignant look at 8 hours of their day. But more than that it begs the question: “is this really the meaning of life?” For others, the humor will be hit or miss and the characters could be annoying or not relatable. For us, these characters are you and me.” – from our review

    Get Then We Came to the End on Amazon >>>

  • Hell or High Water Movie Review — A modern western with four great lead performances

    Hell or High Water Movie Review — A modern western with four great lead performances

    Hell or High Water is an entertaining visit into the western that has a modern flair and characters to make it a memorable entry.

    Hell or High Water is an interesting movie it’s not really a crime thriller. In fact, the heist scenes felt like an afterthought — save for the centerpiece climax. What it’s really about is relationships, how we interact with the people around us, and how are actions are indicative of our experiences. Led by four truly fantastic performances, Hell or High Water is a modern western that feels so in and of its time. Though, it also feels like its roots are dug deep into the genre.

    Hell or High Water tells the story of brothers Toby (Chris Pine) and Tanner Howard (Ben Foster). Their family farm is being threatened with foreclosure following their mother’s passing because of a reverse mortgage that was given out by Texas Midlands bank. With only a few days until the bank seizes the property, the brothers go on a series of bank robberies – Texas Midlands banks to be precise – to pay off the mortgage. However, close on their tail are Texas Rangers Marcus Hamilton (Jeff Bridges) and Alberto Parker (Gil Birmingham).

    Check Out: “La La Land” Movie Review: A surprisingly profound story about dreams and disappointments



    What makes Hell or High Water so endearing is that it carefully treads on the line of satire. I’ve never been to West Texas, but if I had to imagine what it was like, it would probably be this ridiculous version. People say things like “if I can find a rope short enough” and “you’re not even Mexicans!” Even more hilariously, literally every single person has a gun.

    Another element that takes Hell or High Water from entertaining to a smart piece of film is it’s not so subtle subtext about recession-era America. Small towns, big banks, and unpayable mortgages have become the key actors in the housing bubble burst. Just ask Margot Robbie while she sits in a bathtub. While this is every bit a crime movie, that theme shines through.

    However, this is also where my criticism lies. While subtlety usually isn’t the forte of westerns, Hell or High Water really hits you over the head with its themes. From giant flashy bankruptcy billboards to lines that all but say “stick it to the man,” the film doesn’t leave much to the imagination.

    hell or high water movie review

    What does show a little subtlety are the scenes between characters. After all, this is a movie about two partnerships. The relationship between Toby and Tanner isn’t one built on their experiences together. If anything, this spree of bank robberies is their first experience that really brings them together. Their bond is more instinctual. Tanner knows he has to protect his younger brother. He knows the part that he plays in their story.

    The relationship between Marcus and Alberto is both more complex and interesting. Like any western, ball-busting is expected. But the banter between these two, which is sometimes openly racist, doesn’t let on the care that these two have for each other. Though we only see a few days of their lives, the care they have for each other runs deep. You can tell that their collective experiences together have bonded them in the same way brothers are.  While much of Jeff Bridges’ performance is this outlandish stereotypical sheriff, there are some scenes of nuance.

    Taylor Sheridan, whose screenwriting debut was last year’s Sicario, isn’t the striking new screenwriter around. But there’s something endearing about the stories and characters he creates. Look at Emily Blunt’s play-it-by-the-book FBI agent who is out of her depth or Jeff Bridges’ cantankerous cop on the edge of retirement. They’re two completely different characters, but Sheridan instills a quality that feels real in both of them. That carries over to other characters in Hell or High Water, even those with little screentime. Sheridan and director David Mackenzie make the characters feel lived in. Everyone from the four main roles to the waitress at the diner felt like fleshed out people with lives outside of the timeline of the movie.

    Check Out: “Loving” Movie Review: Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga are quietly powerful



    That being said, so much of the success of the movie has to be accredited to the four main actors. Ben Foster’s dedicated performance seems one-note, but small moments like seeing his mother’s hospital bed adds complexity. Chris Pine has never seemed like an actor in the business for the art. I don’t know if that’s true, but it seems like he took the time to perfect the character. Gil Birmingham has the hard role of playing the straight man to Bridges’ outlandish Texas Ranger. However, he handles himself with ease. But, it is really Jeff Bridges in the role that he was born to play that steals the entire movie. Long drawn out shots of his face hint at something more sincere in his tough guy facade.

    Overall, Hell or High Water works as a modern western because it is just that. It takes the elements of the genre – the cat-and-mouse chase, shootouts – and applies it to a timely setting. Unlike earlier entries in the genre, the movie blurs the line between good and bad and right and wrong. While it’s completely entertaining, it’s that added layer that makes Hell or High Water completely satisfying.

    8.5/10

    Get Hell or High Water on DVD, Blu-Ray, or digital on Amazon!

  • 2017 Oscar Predictions: Is Emma Stone A Lock to Win Best Actress?

    2017 Oscar Predictions: Is Emma Stone A Lock to Win Best Actress?

    Emma Stone (La La Land) should easily win Best Actress at the Oscars. However, there are two contenders that could take her down.

    Best Actress is looking more and more like it’s going to be going to Emma Stone (La La Land) this year. It would be her first Oscar after being nominated in 2015 for Birdman. It makes sense that she would win now. She’s an industry golden child on the way up, she has a role that allows her to emote, and she’s young. That’s the key in this category, they love awarding young actresses. However, there is one person that I can actually see beating her. Though it’s a long shot, it’s possible.


    But let's start at the bottom first. This is a really competitive year for this category, I can make an argument for any one of these women. So, it's hard to pick an order for the likeliness of winning. My choice for the last place is probably going to surprise a lot of you. Natalie Portman (Jackieseemed to be the only actress who could stand in Stone's way. She even upset her at the Critics Choice Awards. However, the support for both her and her movie have slowly dwindled away. Plus, Jackie is a very divisive movie. It feels like too much art for some people. That also goes for Portman's performance. On top of that, she won an Oscar only seven years ago, which is fresh enough in voters' minds to not think she needs another so soon. [caption id="attachment_9872" align="alignleft" width="400"]la la land emma stone oscars Best Actress Nominee Emma Stone in La La Land[/caption] After her would be Meryl Streep (Florence Foster Jenkins). Although she got in on the strength of her Golden Globes speech, I don't think it will be enough to get her a win. She too recently won and there won't be a rush to reward her. My third place finisher is certainly the dark horse contender as well. Ruth Negga (Lovinggives a really powerful performance in the film. She's a relative newcomer and this is her first nomination. She also plays a real person and is very early in her career. She has all the hallmarks of a winner in this category. However, even further than that, she has two other things going for her. First, Best Actress winners rarely have their film nominated for Best Picture, though she's one of four in this category to have that happen, hers is the only film to not have any major momentum or wins during the season. Lastly, in a year where diversity is the buzz word, she would be another place to show the progress the Academy has made. However, as much as I truly loved her performance, it's my favorite of the year, it's very quiet. Usually, winners in this category are big and bombastic with a lot of emotion. [caption id="attachment_9805" align="alignright" width="400"]loving movie review Best Actress nominee Ruth Negga in Loving [/caption] The nominee with the best shot at upsetting Stone, though, is Isabelle Huppert (Elle). After shockingly upsetting Portman at the Globes, she moved into the forefront of the conversation. Though she missed out at SAG, which is a prerequisite, there is a history of Globe winners going on to win at the Oscars after missing out on SAG. Plus, her movie was snubbed in Foreign Language film – it didn't make the shortlist – so it's likely that voters that liked that film will want to reward it somehow. The two issues she has are that it is very rare for a foreign language actor to win in any category. Second, the film is very divisive. I think Stone has this sewn up. There's nothing indicating that she will miss out on this award. But, weirder things have happened at the Oscars. If history holds, her winning could signal that La La Land won't win Best Picture. They're just stats though. We'll just have to see. Check out all our 2017 Oscar Predictions! Will Win: Emma Stone, La La Land Could Win: Isabelle Huppert, Elle Dark Horse: Ruth Negga, Loving Should Win: Ruth Negga, Loving

  • Hidden Figures review — One of the most enjoyable biopics in years

    Hidden Figures review — One of the most enjoyable biopics in years

    Hidden Figures delicately balances a racial drama with a biopic while also telling the story of the space race. The result is one of the most delightful movies of the year.

    It takes the right kind of movie to get a Thursday night crowd actually cheering in the theater. Well, Hidden Figures is that kind of movie. Crowdpleasers aren’t hard to find in our current cinematic environment. It seems that Hollywood lives off of them. Financially, they do. However, good crowd pleasers are a rarity. Last year saw The Martian was the perfect example. You rooted for the success of the main characters and wallowed in their defeats. But in the end, you were up off your seat cheering at the photo finish. However, Hidden Figures is a more complex story than The Martian. In addition to being a true story, director Theodore Melfi had to carefully balance a biopic with a race drama, all the while telling the story of the space race with Russia.

    Hidden Figures tells the story of three unsung heroes of NASA. Dorothy Vaughan (Octavia Spencer) is the informal supervisor of the West Area Computers Division, which is a group of thirty black women doing the calculations for the spacecrafts. Two of those women are Mary Jackson (Janelle Monáe), an aspiring engineer, and mathematician Katherine Goble (Taraji P. Henson), who is the center of our story.




    The movie opens with the three ladies stranded on the side of the road after Dorothy’s car breaks down. A cop comes to investigate and becomes distracted by the fact that the ladies work for NASA. This scene makes two things clear. First, it reminds us of the racial tensions of our society at the time. Second, it reveals that no matter what, the space race is at the front of everyone’s mind. Katherine is reassigned to the Space Task Group, which does the calculations for the all the shuttle missions. However, she finds that she is the only female and only person of color working in the division. This leads to animosity between her and her coworkers. They bring in a coffee pot for colored people in a heartbreaking instance. More subtly, Katherine’s bright patterned dresses clash against the uniform white button downs and black ties worn by everyone else in the department.

    However, this animosity is demonstrated beautifully and heartbreakingly in a single scene. The building that contains the Space Task Group doesn’t have a colored bathroom. So, she has to run in her heels and skirt half a mile to the West Area Computers division with her work in hand. She works while she uses the bathroom, then runs back to her office. This is played for laughs the first few times. It is even set to Pharrell’s song “Runnin’.” However, on a rainy day, this simple injustice causes Katherine to snap. Taraji P. Henson is an actress with a lot of power behind her, and she lets it go in this scene. But what makes it so effective is that Melfi builds up to it. He earns that scene and Henson knocks it out of the park. It may be emotionally manipulative filmmaking, but to the movie’s credit, it essentially asks you to buy into it emotionally and you allow it.

    More than anything, these women just want to work and do what they love. They want to have the opportunity to prove themselves. Allison Schroeder and Melfi’s screenplay, which they adapted from the book of the same name, does just that. It places the lens of the movie squarely on these ladies. It filters our society through their experiences. It’s one thing for a biopic to tell a story. Hidden Figures is the rare biopic to show me a real person.





    The movie tells the story of unsung heroes and it makes it a point to remind you of the impact of both their work and the work. It has a reverence for its subjects that is so vital. Part of that is thanks to the incredible performances from the cast. Kevin Costner does great work as Al Harrison, the director of the Space Task Group. He is a champion for Katherine and often helps her break the barriers that are systematically set in place. Jim Parsons is also great outside his typical mold as the head engineer Paul Stafford. Kirsten Dunst and Mahershala Ali, who is destined for an Oscar for Moonlight, also give great performances. Glen Powell gives a charming performance as John Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth.

    However, it’s the three leading ladies who carry the movie on their shoulders. Octavia Spencer does her usual great work as the forward-thinking and motivated Dorothy Vaughn. Breakout Janelle Monáe is a scene stealer for much of the movie and has two scenes that would have made excellent Oscar clips. But Taraji Henson gives one of the best performances of the year as Katherine Johnson. She gorgeously emotes in two incredible scenes that are high points for the movie. Though, what I most appreciate about her performance is her internal struggle of suffering from injustices while trying to just do her the best work she can do.

    Is Hidden Figures one of the best written or directed movies of 2016? No. But is it one of the most satisfying and enjoyable movies? Yes! Hidden Figures will hook you from the very first time you see Taraji Henson, Janelle Monáe, and Octavia Spencer grace the screen and not let go until the last credit rolls. Watching Hidden Figures is perhaps one of the best times I had in the theater recently. It doesn’t just emulate a crowd pleaser, it’s the definition of a crowd pleaser.

    ★★★★ out of 5


  • Golden Globe Predictions 2017 – Film

    Golden Globe Predictions 2017 – Film

    The Golden Globes are the first major stop on the way to the Oscars. While the winner here aren’t exactly predictive, many consider speeches their Oscar auditions. Here are our predictions for the 2017 Golden Globes!

    Check out our 2017 Oscar Predictions!

    Best Motion Picture, Drama

    Nominees:
    Hacksaw Ridge
    Hell or High Water
    Lion
    Manchester by the Sea
    Moonlight

    Will Win: Moonlight
    Could Win: Manchester by the Sea
    Should Win: Moonlight
    Dark Horse (possible upset winner)Hacksaw Ridge

    The overall consensus among pundits is that Manchester by the Sea will win this by a hair. However, Moonlight has been on a run this season. Manchester by the Sea just doesn’t have the same buzz that Moonlight has. So, I’m going to give it the edge. However, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Manchester take it. But watch out for Hacksaw Ridge. It has its fans. Plus, anything is possible with Mel Gibson scoring a surprise director nomination.

    Best Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy

    Nominees:
    20th Century Women
    Deadpool
    Florence Foster Jenkins
    La La Land
    Sing Street


    Will Win: La La Land Could Win: N/A Should Win: La La Land Dark HorseDeadpool The Oscar frontrunner La La Land should easily win this category. The Globes award buzz and whenever they actually have a musical in this category, they pounce (Les Miserables, Sweeny Todd, Dreamgirls.) However – and call me crazy – I think Deadpool has a legitimate run at this category. While it certainly has its detractors, its fans are rabid. If somehow there's a crazy upset, that's the film that would pull it off. la la land golden globes

    Actor in a Motion Picture, Drama

    Nominees: Casey Affleck, Manchester by the Sea Joel Edgerton, Loving Andrew Garfield, Hacksaw Ridge Viggo Mortensen, Captain Fantastic Denzel Washington, Fences Will Win: Casey Affleck, Manchester by the Sea Could Win: Denzel Washington, Fences Should Win: Joel Edgerton, Loving Dark Horse: Andrew Garfield, Hacksaw Ridge I think the is a closer race than people think. The Oscar frontrunner Casey Affleck is the obvious choice. However, the Golden Globes love Denzel Washington. He even received the Cecil B. DeMille award last year. He could easily snatch this from under Affleck. With two movies out, Andrew Garfield can also make a late surge.

    Actress in a Motion Picture, Drama

    Nominees: Amy Adams, Arrival Jessica Chastain, Miss Sloane Isabelle Huppert, Elle Ruth Negga, Loving Natalie Portman, Jackie Will Win: Natalie Portman, Jackie Could Win: Isabelle Huppert, Elle Should Win: Ruth Negga, Loving Dark Horse: Amy Adams, Arrival I'm so torn between in this category. Natalie Portman is an Oscar frontrunner, which usually automatically gives you the edge. However, Isabelle Huppert also made a run through the critic's awards. In addition, she is a foreign actress (remember the HFPA is made up of foreign journalists) and had two high-profile movies this year. I'm going to give it to Portman right now, but I can easily see Huppert winning. Watch out for Golden Globe darling Amy Adams to upset here as well.

    Actor in a Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy

    Nominees: Colin Farrell, The Lobster Ryan Gosling, La La Land Hugh Grant, Florence Foster Jenkins Jonah Hill, War Dogs Ryan Reynolds, Deadpool Will Win: Ryan Reynolds, Deadpool Could Win: Ryan Gosling, La La Land Should Win: Ryan Gosling, La La Land Dark Horse: Hugh Grant, Florence Foster Jenkins Ryan vs. Ryan. This is a closer race than I think people make it out to be. While Ryan Gosling is the most likely of the bunch to reap an Oscar nomination, it isn't a straight comedic performance. Plus, he's not a frontrunner to win the Oscar, which is usually the way the Globes go. That's why I think Ryan Reynolds has a clear shot at the win. His performance is broad comedy. So, for drama sake, I'm gonna say Reynolds takes it by a hair. But my advice is that if you hear the name Ryan being called, wait for the presenter to finish before standing up.

    Actress in a Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy

    Nominees: Annette Bening, 20th Century Women Lily Collins, Rules Don't Apply Hailee Steinfeld, The Edge of Seventeen Emma Stone, La La Land Meryl Streep, Florence Foster Jenkins

    Will Win: Emma Stone, La La Land Could Win: Meryl Streep, Florence Foster Jenkins Should Win: Emma Stone, La La Land Dark Horse: Annette Bening, 20th Century Women Without her biggest Oscar rival Natalie Portman in the way, Emma Stone has a clear run at this category. In addition to being in the most likely winner for Best Motion Picture, she has yet to win, which the Globes love. But favorite Meryl Streep, who has 7 Globes and is the Cecille B. DeMille winner this year has a shot. However, most likely the Globes would want to spread the love. fences golden globes

    Actor in a Supporting Role

    Nominees: Mahershala Ali, Moonlight Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water Simon Helberg, Florence Foster Jenkins Dev Patel, Lion Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Nocturnal Animals Will Win: Mahershala Ali, Moonlight Could Win: Dev Patel, Lion Should Win: Mahershala Ali, Moonlight Dark Horse: Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water The Golden Globes are often where the contender with the momentum from the critic's awards can slip up. Think Lupita N'yongo a few years ago. However, I think Mahershala Ali should be safe because a consistent number two competitor hasn't come up. It could possibly be Jeff Bridges, but I actually think Dev Patel has more appeal for this group. They love awarding young actor who have earned their due. Plus, with foreign appeal and the Weinstein company behind him, he has a shot.

    Actress in a Supporting Role

    Nominees: Viola Davis, Fences Naomie Harris, Moonlight Nicole Kidman, Lion Octavia Spencer, Hidden Figures Michelle Williams, Manchester by the Sea Will Win: Viola Davis, Fences Could Win: N/A Should Win: Naomie Harris, Moonlight Dark Horse: Nicole Kidman, Lion Viola Davis would have had to do something pretty terrible to the HFPA to lose this category. Even then, she'd probably still win. There is one scenerio I can see Nicole Kidman winning in, which would be the Weinstein Company going on a run with Lion and shockingly upset Davis.

    Best Director

    Nominees: Mel Gibson, Hacksaw Ridge Damien Chazelle, La La Land Kenneth Lonergan, Manchester by the Sea Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Tom Ford, Nocturnal Animals Will Win: Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Could Win: Damien Chazelle, La La Land Should Win: Damien Chazelle, La La Land or Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Dark Horse: Mel Gibson, Hacksaw Ridge oscars mahershala ali

    Best Screenplay

    Nominees: Damien Chazelle, La La Land Tom Ford, Nocturnal Animals Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Kenneth Lonergan, Manchester by the Sea Taylor Sheridan, Hell or High Water

    Will Win: Kenneth Lonergan, Manchester by the Sea Could Win: Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Should Win: Barry Jenkins, Moonlight Dark Horse: Taylor Sheridan, Hell or High Water

    Best Animated Feature

    Nominees: Kubo and the Two Strings Moana My Life as a Zucchini Sing Zootopia Will Win: Zootopia Could Win: Moana Should Win: Kubo and the Two Strings Dark Horse: My Life as a Zucchini

  • ‘La La Land’ review: Singing through dreams and disappointments

    ‘La La Land’ review: Singing through dreams and disappointments

    La La Land heartbreakingly portrays the highs and lows of chasing dreams. Though packaged as a high-energy feel-good musical, it contains poignant notes that make it great.

    I didn’t like La La Land when I watched it. Frankly, I was disappointed. I was even shining off a spot in my top ten movies of the year for it. I love musicals and grew going to see Broadway shows. Singin’ In the Rain is one of my favorite movies of all time. Needless to say, I wanted to love this movie. So, when I walked out of the theater less than enthralled I was confused. I couldn’t bring myself to give it a score because I was so sure I missed something. As the week trudged on, I told people how disappointed I was in the movie. I couldn’t understand how it missed my expectations by so much.

    However, then I realized that the tune stuck in my head all week were the opening notes from “Another Day of Sun,” the movie’s opening number. So, I went on Spotify and played the soundtrack. I quickly realized how much I really loved the musical’s first half. But I couldn’t shake the feeling that the second half was a narrative misstep, even though the ending stuck with me. I gave the movie a score — I won’t tell you it, but it’s low — and carried on with my post-La La Land week. Then, I saw a tweet that had the Merriam-Webster definition of the term “La La Land”:

    “A euphoric dreamlike state detached from the harsher realities of life.”


    ADVERTISEMENT


    I smacked myself on the head for my stupidity. I realized that I, in fact, missed something. Finally, I was able to give La La Land a proper score (spoiler: it’s a lot higher than my initial one). But let’s backtrack for a second. Damian Chazelle, who directed Whiplash, my favorite movie of 2014, set out to make a movie-musical that transported audiences back to the genre’s heyday in the 40s and 50s. Though, he was careful to balance its timeless plot with the modern issues that face the artists of our generation.

    La La Land tells the story of aspiring actress Mia (Emma Stone). She, like so many people, followed her dreams of stardom to Los Angeles. However, she finds that success isn’t as easy to obtain as the movies say they are. We see her spend her time working at the Starbucks on the Warner Brothers’ studio lot between auditions that often don’t go well — the casting directors couldn’t care less, she’s just one of many of her “type”, someone walks in the room. However, her love for movies is what keeps her going.

    On the other side of things, Sebastian (Ryan Gosling) has dreams of his own. He hopes to own a jazz club one day. His love of jazz runs deep. When someone tells him that they don’t love jazz, like Mia, he sets out to make them appreciate it. However, he has his own problems. Mainly, as a character later in the movie says, jazz is dying… and he has no money. He spends his nights playing Christmas carols in a restaurant under the watchful eye of the owner (J.K. Simmons).


    ADVERTISEMENT


    The movie begins with an absolutely enthralling opening number that takes place on a freeway in the middle of Los Angeles. Yes, an actual freeway. The song, “Another Day of Sun,” perfectly sums up both the disappointment and allure of chasing dreams in a town where everyone is doing the exact same. In one magnificent take, which may possibly one of the best of all time, Chazelle sets the time and place in LA with free runners, salsa dancers, and even a trick bicycle rider in this tightly choreographed number. I don’t know how he was able to pull it off, but it is one of the most magnificent scenes committed to film this year.

    As the film unfolds, we realize that Mia is still in the Honeymoon phase of living in LA. Every day is just another step towards her eventual ascension to the top. Sebastian, alternatively, believes that his true artistry is already there, but yet to be appreciated. When the two bump into each other — at first literally and then coincidentally throughout the movie — they are sure they’re not falling for each other. This is told through “A Lovely Night,” a classic Rogers-Astaire tap dance routine. However, slowly they realize that they are, in fact, falling for each other.

    The first half of the movie plays out like the musicals it’s based on. However, key decisions elevate it to an even higher level. A bright primary color motif is used in the costuming throughout, which gives it a whimsical quality. That coupled with the cinematography that makes strong use of lighting and color, shows us this city where anything is possible that Mia sees. It almost feels like the movie has a rhythm all its own apart from what’s happening on screen. Thanks to editor Tom Cross, who also cut Whiplash, La La Land moves at a lighting pace. That is until we get to Summer — the movie is split up into the four seasons.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    Slowly encouraging each other, Mia and Sebastian start to make moves towards their dreams. Mia, tired of waiting for her perfect part to come, starts to write a one-woman show. Sebastian, looking to raise money for his club, joins a band fronted by former classmate Keith (John Legend). By the time we get to this point the musical scenes start to become few. The bright colors that flooded the costumes and sets fade away. On my first viewing, this is where the movie lost me. I was confused as to why this bright and romantic musical faded away before my eyes. However, this is why the definition of “La La Land” snapped me back to reality. This was completely by design.

    The difference between the two parts is stark. However, it’s essential for Chazelle to suggest that the dreamlike stupor that both Mia and Sebastian were in is gone. Reality sets in, and you know what they say about reality. As they attempt to be together and follow their respective dreams, they learn how trying balancing both is. It all comes to a head in an incredibly emotional scene that is done completely in close-up, which pushes the actors to the edge of their abilities.

    It’s the distinction that I missed. Until I read the definition of the term “La La Land” I thought that the movie just made a tonal misstep. In reality, it was a genius shift from a movie about a couple’s passion for their crafts to one about alienation brought on by our generation’s attitude of never truly doing enough. La La Land is a brilliant study of an entire generation that wants to do it all. We want to be happy and successful and doing what we love. However, La La Land portrays the sad realities.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    As phenomenal as the craft is — nearly every shot, beat, and set is perfect — La La Land would be a lesser movie without Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling. Gosling, who I loved in The Nice Guys earlier this year, again proves his comedic ability. However, it’s his interplay with Stone that makes him great here. He’s there to support her. After all, at a certain point, this becomes her movie. But who is Ginger Rogers without Fred Astaire? Stone, on the other hand, gives one of the best performances of the year and makes it look easy. From perfect comedic timing to crushing the film’s 11 o’clock number, she is an emotional powerhouse. She proves that she is one of the best actresses of our generation. Their partnership and chemistry makes you swoon and then breaks your heart.

    La La Land isn’t going to be for everyone. Some are going to be expecting a straight musical like I did or not completely buy the walk and talk sequences. However, the magic of the on-screen musical will hook you from the beginning. At its core, it’s a romance for our generation. Passion, love, dreams, disappointments, and alienation are its themes. But it never tries to be bigger than it is. Like all the great romances, it starts with the central couple. Mia and Sebastian’s love is one that they need at that time and place. However, like so many modern lovers, the timing never seems right. While La La Land is escapist entertainment for a good chunk, its greatest parts lie in the realities, while not harsh, that plague our dreams. But hey, here’s to the fools who dream.


    ADVERTISEMENT


    More movies, less problems


    Hey! I’m Karl. You can find me on Twitter and Letterboxd. I’m also a Tomatometer-approved critic.

    💌 Sign up for our weekly email newsletter with movie recommendations available to stream.


    ADVERTISEMENT


  • The Wave Movie Review — An American disaster movie in Norway

    The Wave Movie Review — An American disaster movie in Norway

    Despite relying on genre cliches, a new setting and distinctly Norwegian point-of-view make The Wave an enjoyable disaster flick

    By the time we get to the eponymous wave in 2015’s The Wave, we are nearly halfway through the movie. Usually when that happens in a disaster movie, that time feels squandered. But not with The Wave. We feel like we earned the right to see the disaster play out. The build, both for character and plot, is a necessary part of the movie.


    Director Roar Uthaug (one of the most amazing names ever committed to a human) said, “I've always been a fan of disaster movies — Twister, Armageddon — but we'd never made a movie like this in Norway before.” So, while this is a clear and deliberate emulation of the American genre, it feels unfamiliar in this new setting. Where American disaster movies happen in claustrophobic cities, the Norwegian landscape offers both beauty and mystery. The Wave doesn’t break any genre cliches. What it does do is infuse strong craft into it. A recurring weak point for disaster movies is the screenplay and the movie doesn’t do anything to break that streak. We have a few cookie cutter characters — the angsty son, skeptic scientist — that leave you rolling your eyes. On top of that, the movie is just the formula. the-wave-movie-review Now, I just need to geek out for a moment. The cinematography in this movie is f***ing amazing. The use of light, in particular, is a masterful piece of filmmaking. By strategically placing on-screen lighting like car headlights and flashlights, cinematographer John Christian Rosenlund creates shadows that beautifully outline the actors. However, it has another purpose. The way that the light, water, and fog play off each other creates a startling vision of hell. Reflections in the water and smoke enact a dream-like quality that mirrors the character's own shock. The lighting coupled with interesting framing gives off a claustrophobic feeling. On top of that, he has a commanding use of color. The best cinematographers don’t just “shoot the movie,” they add to the emotion. Rosenlund’s work does just that. For a movie with some much destruction and that is, at some points, literally lifeless, he injects beauty. It’s a truly remarkable achievement. While The Wave is an incredibly well-made movie, perhaps even the most well-made in the genre, it still falls into the cliches. That’s what prevents it from being a great movie. However, I’m glad, proud even, that a wholly American film genre is being attempted in other countries. Familiar movies told from another perspective become something else entirely. While The Wave won’t go down as one of the great disaster movies, I hope it starts a new movement of “American disaster movies” being tackled by foreign directors.

    7/10

    The Wave is available on DVD, Blu-Ray, and digital on Amazon!

  • The Impossible Movie Review — Sentimental to A Fault, but Thrilling and Gorgeously Made

    The Impossible Movie Review — Sentimental to A Fault, but Thrilling and Gorgeously Made

    Emotionally raw and unnerving, The Impossible is a disaster movie that is actually a family drama at its core, which makes for a thrilling a beautiful movie

    This month, director J.A. Bayona returns with a movie adaptation of Patrick Ness’ novel A Monster Calls. So, I thought it would be a perfect time to go back and review his last movie, 2012’s The Impossible.

    In 2005, one of the worst natural disasters in history hit the Indian Ocean in the form of a tsunami. More than 230,000 people lost their lives and nearly 2 million were displaced. So naturally we follow the story of a white family in the disaster. I wanted to get this fact out of the way because it must be said that despite the masses of Thai, Indonesians, Sri Lankans, and other Southeast Asians who were affected by the disaster, this film decided to filter it through the lens of a British tourist family. I’m going to revisit this later.




    The Bennett family arrives in Khao Lak, Thailand for a Christmas holiday. Little do they know that their dream vacation is about to turn in a nightmare of epic proportions. The first thing that you notice about The Impossible is how impressive the cinematography is. Even simple scenes like the family landing in Thailand and their Christmas day celebration releasing lanterns into the sky are shot with a perfectly placed eye. 

    However, with most disaster movies the centerpiece tsunami scene is the real breakout. Unlike other disaster set pieces, the tsunami doesn’t focus on the epic scale of the disaster, but rather the physical and emotional struggles of our core family. But in reality, what I was really thinking during the sequence was “how the hell did they do that?” Remarkably realistic to the point that you cringe and gasp every time a piece of debris hits a character or when they’re thrashed and impaled as the fury of the water takes its toll on them. If there isn’t a modern argument for practice effects, this sequence is surely it. Bayona used nearly no CGI in the scene.

    the impossible film review

    Naomi Watts as Maria Bennett shows her talents as an actor as she is the lens we view the actual disaster through. Her pain is our pain and her feelings as a mother and a scared human in a seemingly hopeless situation are our feelings.

    And while Watts got the most praise for her performance, the true star here is Tom Holland as the son, Lucas (which bodes well for his turn as Spider-Man). At just 10-years-old at the time of filming, the range of emotions that he was able to convey was incredible for any actor. In the face of incredible odds his character has to deal with conflicting desires to be a strong authoritative figure and reverting to a lost adolescent.

    Nevertheless, Ewan McGregor as the family’s patriarch and the two young performers Samuel Joslin and Oaklee Pendergast are equally fantastic in the film.

    After the disaster, the movie diverts to a story about the aftermath and the new tale of survival the family is thrown into. However, more than that, the movie tells the story of both the chaos in the face of disaster and the power of the human spirit.

    Yes, the movie took a lot of hits for focusing on a white tourist family in this disaster that affected so many Southeast Asian families. However, this decision does make it an easier entry for the Western audiences that are going to be watching this movie. Bayona wanted to filter the story through the eyes of people that we can relate to, and the Spanish family this is based on was the way in.




    However, Bayona did take care to show the range of people affected and the range of people that went to the rescue. The first people to go searching for survivors were the natives and they get their due. 

    While the first two acts are raw, unnerving cinema at its best, the third becomes overly sentimental with a few eye-rolling moments. It feels like it’s a completely different movie from the beginning. There are one too many constructed heartfelt moments. However, it’s not enough to completely take the wind out of the sails of an otherwise engaging and impressive family drama.

    In the end, The Impossible is a surprisingly entertaining and satisfying take on the human spirit in the face of, well, impossible odds. It tracks the unthinkable decisions that this family has to make to survive and the emotional toll it takes on them. Sometimes it’s sentimental to a fault, but the thrilling and innovative filmmaking that’s being done makes it all worth it.

    7/10

    The Impossible is available for digital rental on Amazon!

  • 2017 Oscar Predictions: It’s Mahershala Ali vs. Dev Patel for Best Supporting Actor

    2017 Oscar Predictions: It’s Mahershala Ali vs. Dev Patel for Best Supporting Actor

    Best Supporting Actor is looking like it’s going to go to Mahershala Ali for Moonlight. However, there is certainly room for an upset.

    While it took a while for the race for Best Supporting Actor to take shape, a clear frontrunner has emerged in Mahershala Ali (Moonlight). His towering performance was a favorite among the early critic awards (and in my review for the movie) and he will certainly be swept along with the buzz for the movie. Plus, the Best Picture frontrunners tend to win an acting award. So, if Moonlight remains popular, then Ali could be taken along. His loss at the Globes and BAFTA is telling, though. It shows that he isn’t infallible like Viola Davis (Fences) over in supporting actress. 

    Starting with the actor with the smallest chance of upsetting is Michael Shannon (Nocturnal Animals). He was probably the most critically-acclaimed actor in the film despite the odd Aaron Taylor-Johnson win at the Golden Globes. However, no acting award winner has won the Oscar after being snubbed by the Globes and SAG — Marcia Gay Harden is the only actor to pull this off. Plus, his film was shut out from all the other categories. So, Shannon probably doesn’t need to worry about preparing a speech.

    oscars mahershala ali best supporting actorCheck Out: Will Moonlight, La La Land, or Manchester by the Sea win Best Picture?



    Lucas Hedges (Manchester by the Sea) has the benefit of pretty much being a co-lead to Casey Affleck. Though the supporting actor category is a lot less prone to category fraud as the actress counterpart, when it does happen, it seems like it's more of a pro than a con. However, there is a bigger statistic going against him. The Academy tends to award older and more veteran actors. In fact, supporting actor has become a sort of lifetime achievement award — Christopher Plummer, Alan Arkin, Morgan Freeman. And at the ripe age of 20, Hedges is the youngest nominee this year in any category. Unless there is a sudden and unexpected Manchester sweep, it's safe to say he probably won't win. Who I do think has a chance at upsetting Ali is Jeff Bridges (Hell or High Water). His grizzled police officer role is a popular type for the older and whiter Academy. Plus, Bridges is a very popular actor. In thus Trump era we're in, he would be the alternative for voters that skew towards that demographic. The nominee with the best chance at beating Ali is Dev Patel (Lion). With the great Harvey Weinstein behind him fueling his campaign, Patel will have a strong narrative behind him. He's been in the industry for a while and was snubbed for his main role in the Best Picture winning Slumdog Millionaire. He has a lot of screentime in a really meaty role. Plus, I think Lion is the dark horse contender in a lot of categories. It's a feel-good movie with a lot of substance. The biggest indication that he could be the more likely contender than Bridges is his win at BAFTA. While BAFTA isn't exactly the best indicator. It does help with where the momentum is going. While there is no perfect contender to take Ali down, Patel is certainly the closest. Either way, I think Mahershala should be getting a space set up on his mantel! Check out the rest of our 2017 Oscar Predictions! Will Win: Mahershala Ali, Moonlight Could Win: Dev Patel, Lion Dark Horse: Jeff Bridges, Hell or High Water Should Win: Mahershala Ali, Moonlight

  • Loving Movie Review — Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga are quietly powerful

    Loving Movie Review — Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga are quietly powerful

    Though unsentimental to a fault, Loving is a surprising and beautiful portrait of the reluctant revolutionaries, Richard and Mildred Loving

    Movies based on real events often fall into the trap of just showing plot point after plot point, often at the expense of real character development. Take The Theory of Everything or J. Edgar. However, when it goes right — see The Social Network or Malcolm X — it could be something truly amazing. In Jeff Nichols’ Loving, the entire movie is made up of the moments between the plot points. This is not a story about the case Loving v. Virginia. This is a story about Richard and Mildred Loving.

    Interest in the Lovings has been renewed with the legalization of gay marriage earlier this year. The Loving v. Virginia case was even cited in the majority opinion. As one-half of a gay interracial couple, I owe a lot to the Lovings. However, if I ever got the chance to thank them in person, I think they would shrug it off. The Lovings weren’t looking to change the world. When the film begins, they are just a couple excited that they are expecting their first child.




    Like any decent man in the 1950s, Richard asks Mildred to marry him. So, they hike up to Washington, D.C. to be wed. For them, even marriage is a modest affair. They didn’t even tell her mother and sister. However, as simple as they wanted their lives to be, it got a lot more complicated when the police broke into their home to arrest them for violating anti-miscegenation laws.

    Jeff Nichols is a master at knowing where to point his camera. Seemingly random shots like that of a group of men drinking around a table or two women hanging clothes take on a new meaning in this film. The former is a form of scathing judgment, the latter is a form of acceptance. It adeptly portrays the dark period of time in this country. However, that darkness is juxtaposed against the love story of the Lovings.

    For such a quiet movie, Loving moves at a lightning pace. We cover nearly two decades of the Lovings lives. Thanks to the incredible craft, particularly the costumes and editing, we feel like we are dropped into those periods. As we watch their children grow up and their case progress, we watch their everyday lives (with one too many bricklaying scenes — literal bricklaying). However, when there are more emotional scenes, Nichols adds the flair that he showed in Midnight Special earlier this year. One of those scenes show a photo shoot the Lovings did with time, which yielded one of the most famous photos of the couple:

    richard-mildred-loving

    My biggest criticism of the film is that it’s unsentimental, often to a fault. Sometimes you just want to yell at the screen and tell them to show some emotion. It was an interesting choice. The Loving story is ripe for big emotional reactions, grandstanding speeches, and difficult to watch scenes. Instead, Nichols finds emotion in the stolen glances and soft reactions.

    Without Ruth Ann Negga and Joel Edgerton in the role of the Lovings, the movie could have easily faltered. They perfected a chemistry that few on-screen pairs can achieve. Negga’s performance, in particular, is a revelation. She is an emotional powerhouse with such little dialogue. Scenes like when she discovers they’ve won are quietly powerful.




    Loving isn’t a film trying to be bigger than it is. Honestly, that’s how I think the Lovings would have wanted it. You can call them reluctant heroes or revolutionaries. What they really were was a married couple that wanted to live in their home state. The film could have tried to make a stand on the fundamental right to marry, but it’s not even a question that they felt they needed to answer. While in the film we do hear that they’re happy to help other couples like them, it isn’t a triumphant declaration. It was more of a nice sentiment. In the end, the struggle they went through could be justified in a single line that Richard directed at the Supreme Court: “tell them I love my wife.”

    8/10

    Get Loving on DVD, Blu-Ray, or digital on Amazon!

  • Moonlight Movie Review — An instant classic and landmark in film history

    Moonlight Movie Review — An instant classic and landmark in film history

    Moonlight is gorgeously crafted, masterfully acted, surprisingly timely, and demands to be watched and respected

    It wasn’t until I got into my twenties that I became aware of what identity is. Identity is as much how you view yourself as what the world views you as. You may be a minority or gay or poor, but that doesn’t mean you have to identify as those things. It’s truly your experience that shapes your identity. Any LGBTQ+ person knows what it is to struggle with identity. Hell, anyone that is anything different from what society views as normal has struggled with identity. It’s a process that is as emotionally taxing as it is satisfying. Learning who you truly are and who you see yourself to be is one of the most liberating — sometimes heartbreaking — experiences. That’s what Moonlight really is about: identity. Not only the concept of identity, but the process of discovering, struggling, and ultimately accepting who you are.

    Moonlight is split up into three parts that are named after the nicknames that our main character is called: Little, Chiron, and Black. In little, we meet young Chiron (Alex Hibbert) as he is running away from a group of taunting classmates. Eventually, he finds shelter in a crack house and is soon discovered by Juan (Mahershala Ali), who takes him under his wing. Juan is an interesting character. He is the only character whose perspective we see outside of Chiron’s. This is an important choice because Juan is a character whose identity as a drug dealer directly contradicts his caring personality.




    Eventually, Juan takes him under his wing along with his girlfriend Teresa (Janelle Monae). They become Chiron’s figurative parents while his real mother, Paula (Naomie Harris), is on drugs or with random men. This part is about Chiron discovering his identity. Juan is there to assure him that there are other people out there like Chiron.

    The second part of the film follows Chiron as a teenager as he struggles with his identity. At this point in his journey, he’s as confused and vulnerable as ever. He must deal with his mother falling further into drug addiction, his place as a punching bag for the school’s bullies, and his deepening confusion about his sexuality. However, maintaining a close eye on his subjects, Jenkins portrays Chiron’s struggle with a chilling intimacy that culminates in a chilling final shot.

    In the final act, Chiron has transformed into Juan both physically, professionally, and mentally. There is even a scene where he gives a pep talk to a younger associate. However, this act is outlined by his acceptance of who he is. Ultimately, he must face his past ghosts and find a way to embrace it as part of his identity.

    moonlight movie review

    Jenkins and cinematographer James Laxton were careful to shoot nearly the entire film in close-up. It’s a deeply personal story. However, Jenkins also doesn’t shy away from cinematic flair. In particular, composer Nicholas Brittell’s score mixes old school rap and hip hop with classical music to outline the beauty and savagery of growing up. The most surprising element though is the sound. It comes in and drops out in the perfect places. However, the most effective part of its design is when we hear dialogue, but all we see is a look in the actors’ faces.

    I need to take a moment to talk about this incredible cast. First, the three actors that portray Chiron are revelations and bring entirely different perspectives on the role that come together to create this dynamic character. Alex Hibbert, who portrays the young Chiron, has this knowing look that captures his attempt to understand something that is just out of grasp. Teen Chiron, portrayed by Ashton Sanders, instead uses his physicality to show his inner battle to embrace who he truly is or what society wants him to be. Finally, Trevante Rhodes’ performance as the adult Chiron shows the character at his most emotionally vulnerable.




    However, they are joined by a supporting cast that use their limited screentime to make huge impacts. Naomie Harris, who plays Chiron’s mother in all three parts of the film, is phenomenal throughout the film. But her third act monologue is one of the best-acted scenes of the year. Jharelle Jerome, who plays Chiron’s love interest Kevin as a teenager, is a surprisingly naturalistic performer. Mahershala Ali, though, towers in the film. Though his screen time is short, his impact is felt throughout the movie. It’s truly a masterclass in acting. Then there is Andre Holland who plays Kevin as an adult. His performance is perhaps one of the best of the year. Along with Rhodes, he created scenes that felt so natural and real that I was floored that this was actually a movie. 

    LGBTQ+ characters are marginalized in film. However, black gay characters are completely in the periphery. Moonlight bravely brings them into the forefront. It is easily a turning point for queer cinema and black cinema alike. In the end, though, Moonlight is a love letter to the people that struggle with their identity and sometimes feel isolated. It works as both a comfort and a glimmer of hope. But that’s not to take away from the craft of the film. The only way to describe Moonlight is as art. It’s pure, unadulterated art. It’s storytelling at it’s best. It’s filmmaking at it’s best. It’s romantic, emotional, and, most importantly, a film that needs to be seen. 

    10/10

    Preorder Moonlight on DVD, Blu-Ray, or digital on Amazon!